He's not good enough to play that role. He's a worker and I dont see the invention in him. You have to be very adept at getting your feet right and changing direction quickly and be constructing moves in your head two or three passes in advance. It is a hell of a task and that;s why these players are so expensive and thin on the ground. Davies couldn't do the job in a month of Sundays. He has his attributes and he's realising them where he starts now.
Schneiderlin had a very good game last night and patrolled in front of the defence really effectively. I like the way he looks to pass forward, and with better movement in front of him, he will quickly turn defence into attack.
I admit it wasn't Ross' best night, but even then he nearly every good attacking moment started with him. For example, the move for Davies' header late on started with a ball from Barkley out wide. I think people are way way too harsh on Barkley without looking at the bigger picture.
Every single one of our midfielders had occasions of giving the ball away last night, but it seems it's always Barkley who gets it in the neck. Probably because he has extra responsibility on him being the attacking link.
I'm not saying Davies couldn't do it, but as far as i'm aware he's not played as an attacking mid has he?
I dont think there's any doubting he is a decent midfield player. I just think we overpaid for him by about £10M and that position wasn't a crucial one to be filled.Fair enough Davek. All good points fo be fair, I just personally see a little something in his vision of passing. Perhaps his other attributes would be lost further forward, mind.
This being said, I'm not suggesting davies would take over from barkley, just potentially an option when barkleys game isn't having it.
There are other options though too, playing tighter to lukaku etc or throwing another striker to produce options in front of him.
Schneids though ay? What did you think? I waa quietly impressed
I dont think there's any doubting he is a decent midfield player. I just think we overpaid for him by about £10M and that position wasn't a crucial one to be filled.
He might come on leaps and bounds and in dimensions I/we dont think possible. But he looks like a different type of player to that. Tbf to him, he accepts he doesn't have a great repertoire of moves he can deploy and that he'll work on doing the stuff he is good at even better. That is very commendable and very astute for someone of his age.I don't see how you can say what he can't do after only 6-7 games of his career. He has improved massively in those games and will no doubt have bad patches... the more he plays the more he will learn and if he keeps learning we will eventually be able to see if he can or can't play further forward... my opinion is that he has the potential to play that role
Apart from 2 horrendous hospital passes, he looked very good.
I dont think there's any doubting he is a decent midfield player. I just think we overpaid for him by about £10M and that position wasn't a crucial one to be filled.
Only Koeman would have paid that price for a player not in their own team's plans. I cant remember a stampede for Schneiderlin's services at that price, can you?He is quite easily a 24 mil player in todays money mate, I think you struggle to grasp inflation. The 14mil we paid for McCarthy is probably the equivalent of 24mil now and Schnieds is much better.
Only Koeman would have paid that price for a player not in their own team's plans. I cant remember a stampede for Schneiderlin's services at that price, can you?