Only McNeil when he's fit, Garner to some extent.
I think if you’re going 3 cbs with wing backs then you want Lindstrom on the right like he was today with O’Brien in the 3
If you’re going 2 cbs, then Patterson as rb and Lindstrom as RM could work
Only McNeil when he's fit, Garner to some extent.
How do you expect any player to hit form when they’ve been sat on the bench for most of the season watching a grandad playing instead of him?….bull in a china shop, he really needs to be more composed otherwise no manager will chance him in our predicament. Maybe a fellow Scotsman in charge and new coaches can take the fizz out of his game.
its where he played for Frankfurt when the RS and West Ham wanted him. (one of the tens in a 3-4-3)Lindstrom more centrally almost feels a waste tbh when there are other options that would allow Doucoure to be dropped whilst keeping Lindstrom in arguably his best position
Lindstrom for Doucoure would be good. Two no.10s who can dribble behind DCL/Beto plus a right back who tries to cross from the byline.Has something this lad
Don’t see how he fits into this team though if we’re going 3 CB’s and wing backs
Arguably it should be Young on the left and Lindstrom on the right
If we go four at the back then I’d start him though
I think if you’re going 3 cbs with wing backs then you want Lindstrom on the right like he was today with O’Brien in the 3
If you’re going 2 cbs, then Patterson as rb and Lindstrom as RM could work
Dried buckfastWhat’s that thing on his chin?
This opinion was clearly forged before today's performance. He did very well, and showed composure at a time when others were panicking.….bull in a china shop, he really needs to be more composed otherwise no manager will chance him in our predicament. Maybe a fellow Scotsman in charge and new coaches can take the fizz out of his game.
This opinion was clearly forged before today's performance. He did very well, and showed composure at a time when others were panicking.