Blast_of_Cannock
Player Valuation: £10m
He's the modern day Emile Heskey?Let's sign a striker that's famous for not scoring goals
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's the modern day Emile Heskey?Let's sign a striker that's famous for not scoring goals
Maybe bold but we all have known that we needed a forward 4 weeks ago, should we wait until the window is closing to bring in a forward in when we could be in a position of played 6 and only 1 point,we still need another forward after Maupay
Those players didn't win anything and now even worse ones are coming. If Everton keep buying players like this then you will die before you see a trophy
Maupay plays as a support striker, we're going to have to change the way we play to accommodate him. This signing makes no sense at all. A striker who rarely scores and who plays in a front two is supposed to be the catalyst for change in a team that creates few chances and plays one up front? I don't get it.There’s very few strikers who are good enough to completely change the way a team plays. Only the very top bracket ones can act as both play makers and consistent goal scorers.
If you dropped prime Messi Suarez Aguero into some of the recent Everton teams then yes, they’d undoubtedly help the build up and goalscoring. Put a striker like Lewandowski into some of the recent Everton teams however and I’m not sure we’d make that many chances for him.
If we get to a position where we’re making chances galore and Maupay is passing them up then fine we can talk about whether he’s a proven prem scorer or not, but recently we’ve not even been making that many chances. Anyone other than some of the best strikers of all time are going to struggle upfront for us until we start having more of the ball and creating more.
He's likely to get a few reds too, short fuse...Explosive and can hit the target.
I change my mind, mauppet seems reasonable if we keep Gordon.
Richarlison was arguably a support striker coming in off the left.Maupay plays as a support striker, we're going to have to change the way we play to accommodate him. This signing makes no sense at all. A striker who rarely scores and who plays in a front two is supposed to be the catalyst for change in a team that creates few chances and plays one up front? I don't get it.
Just close your eyes. It makes no difference as he's normally invisible on the pitch.Is he registered for tomorrow? My retina can’t take any more of Rondon
Maybe but it doesn't change what we are seeing on the pitch and none of us want to go through another season like the last one.Think he was referring to the bold text you used Dave... lol
He didn't play in a front 2, and last season he was our centre forward most of the time because we had no actual strikers. A bit like now, really.Richarlison was arguably a support striker coming in off the left.
Because he wasn’t a 9 and he wasn’t a winger.
We play a system where Gordon and Gray play off the sides of our CF as support strikers. That's where Maupay will play. Consider him our Richarlison replacement, he has a very similar goal return and impact over the last 3 years for Brighton. Broja or Brereton Diaz will be the cover for DCL.Maupay plays as a support striker, we're going to have to change the way we play to accommodate him. This signing makes no sense at all. A striker who rarely scores and who plays in a front two is supposed to be the catalyst for change in a team that creates few chances and plays one up front? I don't get it.
32 year old Teemu Pukki who has scored 22 Premier league goals?