Errrr noI can't find it, but there is an interview with football kicker Jack Grealish where he talks about it. Does that count?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Errrr noI can't find it, but there is an interview with football kicker Jack Grealish where he talks about it. Does that count?
Welbeck scored a couple of belters!Could easly be argued they did have a good season for brighton standards. One of the better teams in the league to watch. I watched them out play loads of sides. They just didnt have or had the resources to go buy a decent finisher. The rest of their game was very good.
I don't want to rush it but getting a guy basically at the exact start of preseason doesn't feel like a good move either.I’d be happy to wait if we had an agreement
Welbeck scored a couple of belters!
Well what actually is the point in it then?? Why wouldn’t you just use “big chances created” as a stat?
You don’t have a clue on much soccer-related unfortunately
Nope.I can't find it, but there is an interview with football kicker Jack Grealish where he talks about it. Does that count?
Danny as physically robust as ever!But scored 6 all season. That was their issue.
Cant believe he had the brass neck to post this.He literally said “big chances created” lol lol lol
I can understand that some people think Xg can be boring, but it is a fairly useful analysis tool. After a match, most supporters talk about who had the most shots on goal, and who had the biggest chances. What Xg does is quantify just that on the basis of a large amount of data.
Furthermore, you adjust for distance, angle, which body part you use to finish with on the goal, etc. The latest model also takes into account the player's skills. There are a number of variables you adjust for in the model. Then it's just about probabilities, which in itself can be difficult enough.
Still, the Xg models are far more reliable than variables such as shots, shots on target, etc. No models are perfect, but it is an upgrade from previous models. I think all clubs use the model in one form or another, but there are many different Xg models. So if you cling to older stats like shots on goal, and make fun of Xg, you should update your knowledge.
However, I think, if I remember correctly, shots on target outperformed an Xg model in Scotland a couple of years ago, but in general the Xg model is far more reliable.
What's the point of this thread? We don't choose the manager.