New Everton Owners: The Friedkin Group

[Damo_1878]

Didn't Davek get a thread ban for monopolising a topic?

I bet most of the posts on this thread come from one source (and all probably say a variation of the same thing)

Listen you/others can't deny what I say when I say it one day like that

And you know this how genius?

From the opening day programme notes

Writing in his programme notes for Everton’s opening fixture against Brighton & Hove Albion, Chong, who is also the club’s chief stadium development officer, said: “I know there has been a lot of talk about the future ownership of the club. While the club and The Friedkin Group jointly confirmed that we would not be progressing with their potential takeover, our relationship is still a positive one and their £200m loan helped us to finalise our stadium funding.

So you are calling Colin Chong liar? Don't hide behind the "misleading" bs. Be man enough to stand behind your claims.

Then call for a "thread ban" when the evidence is presented that confirms what I said

Just because you don't like the evidence

What is the point in a forum then?

 

[allen]

Listen you/others can't deny what I say when I say it one day like that



Then call for a "thread ban" when the evidence is presented that confirms what I said

Just because you don't like the evidence

What is the point in a forum then?

I think the problem is that no one really cares.

 

[MisterJ]

Listen you/others can't deny what I say when I say it one day like that



Then call for a "thread ban" when the evidence is presented that confirms what I said

Just because you don't like the evidence

What is the point in a forum then?

No, there is nothing wrong about what you said; it's just you only needed to say it once.

For someone who supposedly works in Legal, you don't seem to understand that if you keep going on about one topic, you lose peoples interest.

Say it once in such a way that grabs peoples interest, then let them continue the conversation. Don't steamroll over everything and everyone with your view and moan when others disagree.

Let the conversation breathe

 

[Joey66]

No, there is nothing wrong about what you said; it's just you only needed to say it once.

For someone who supposedly works in Legal, you don't seem to understand that if you keep going on about one topic, you lose peoples interest.

Say it once in such a way that grabs peoples interest, then let them continue the conversation. Don't steamroll over everything and everyone with your view and moan when others disagree.

Let the conversation breathe

You want to go on the DCL thread - for continuous boring threads on him

 

[Damo_1878]

You want to go on the DCL thread - for continuous boring threads on him

I'm not in there, incidentally

 

[Exeter_Gently]

I do wonder now whether they will be getting personally involved with the naming rights deal or leaving it up to Kenyon.

 

[allen]

I do wonder now whether they will be getting personally involved with the naming rights deal or leaving it up to Kenyon.

I think the longevity of the deal means they'll have to be involved.

They'd be crazy not to if they can't renegotiate it for a decade.

 

[IrishBlue2022]

Mate I think at this point no one is particularly bothered.

Let's just look to Bluer skies and have some positivity.

Your right we need to look forward to brighter things.

 

[IrishBlue2022]

If you don't hold executives at the club to account they will continue with this sort of thing

It's part of the culture

"Positivity" should never equal delusion

The truth is important

Maybe hold yourself to the same standards. You operate just like Bill.

 

[Curtis]

Listen you/others can't deny what I say when I say it one day like that



Then call for a "thread ban" when the evidence is presented that confirms what I said

Just because you don't like the evidence

What is the point in a forum then?

Damo you seem to be misconstruing your posts and attaching some unfounded self importance because your contributions aren't akin to being a propublica reporter revealing something enlightening like the panama papers. It's a football forum , lighten up

 

[Frenk]

There may have been a plan but Friedkin taking over has altered it.

Nah, simply not possible.

 

[Exeter_Gently]

I think the longevity of the deal means they'll have to be involved.

They'd be crazy not to if they can't renegotiate it for a decade.

Probably the most important sponsorship deal since forever.

You'd imagine they want a big say.

 

[Exeter_Gently]

Nah, simply not possible.

Yeah we don't really do plans.

 

[blueboy72]

Probably the most important sponsorship deal since forever.

You'd imagine they want a big say.

I think that deal will be on hold till they walk through the door.

 

[blackie_jones75]

I think that deal will be on hold till they walk through the door.

defo, it would be madness otherwise