Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ITK in question claimed in no uncertain terms that the purchase completed. A few of us explained that they wouldn't realistically complete a purchase without planning consent, and that any deal would be 'subject to planning'. Soon after, the insider knowledge magically changed to 'deal agreed subject to planning'.Blimey, so the ITK suggestions that we'd agreed this price "subject to planning permission" in August 2016 were absolutely miiiiiiiiiiiiles out.
It's hard to understand what couldn't be anticipated on use of land. It's a stadium plus retail I would imagine.
Love the fact that Dan Meis retreated this ...
View attachment 35298
Little dig at those cretins across the park
Still ... he obviously doesn't know more than certain people on here though
I read on another forum that Fomento CC a major Spanish construction company had been approached by Everton , for what I have no idea , but it does look like things are starting to pick up !Probably been posted but enjoyed reading this from yesterday.
https://www.insidermedia.com/insider/northwest/deal-nears-for-state-of-the-art-everton-fc-stadium
Why on earth is an architect of his apparent repute getting involved in spats like that?
It's little wonder that many of us see this whole project as being a bit flaky when we have the vociferous backing of a Mayor involved in slanging matches and the proposed architect egging him on in public. Can these 'professionals' not have a bit of decorum and behave themselves?
He sounds the type to do it.Where's the fun in that? Once there is a design in place for the stadium and construction has started I hope he straps a model of the new stadium to himself and skips around outside Anfield for the afternoon.
Oh for goodness sake Dave, now you're an architectural expert!!!!He sounds the type to do it.
We should have gone with Herzog. They are class.
He knows everything about nothing,Oh for goodness sake Dave, now you're an architectural expert!!!!
I like their stuff. It's very neat and I think a little bit of the conservatism we require for our stadium. I've listened to Meis' thoughts and he sounds a bit hippy drippy with all the "stadium will flow out into the urban space" stuff. It all sounds very California dreamin' to me.Oh for goodness sake Dave, now you're an architectural expert!!!!
That sounds even more of a change in tone.
But let's have it right here: that 'heads of terms' agreement is a pretty provisional thing and underlines just how far away we are from agreeing anything on Bramley Dock much less building anything down there.
We are miles off. I know no one wants to hear that, but we simply are miles off.
Why on earth is an architect of his apparent repute getting involved in spats like that?
It's little wonder that many of us see this whole project as being a bit flaky when we have the vociferous backing of a Mayor involved in slanging matches and the proposed architect egging him on in public. Can these 'professionals' not have a bit of decorum and behave themselves?