TheFinnFan
Finners
" World class, ground breaking and iconic stadium "
"a landmark for the City’s spectacular north Liverpool waterfront"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i honestly dont get it, ...
hang on a minute,
maybe its the council holding US to ransom, 'yes you can have the land and the planning, but we want £5m a year for the priviledge' ?? we will have to finance it the way we (the council) decide.
Only if it is dropped on my doorstep by Juan Mata.
Brilliant news and brilliant deal. All negativity remember this-
Moshiri has been there less than 13 months:
1) Secured investment
2) Landed new stadium site
3) Odd hiccups - but we are able to buy better players
4) Got Koeman, after ridding of Martinez
5) Finch Farm deal
6) Better shirt sponsor deal
Have I missed anything, or should we have been expecting to see stadium plans/blueprints, new train stations, parking lots, boat terminals etc. today?
Me, Im OVER THE BLOODY BLUE MOON!
It's taken Chelsea 13 years to do that, they've taken that long because he had to build them up. In 2003/4 he could afford to buy a new stadium so why did they wait 13 years?There wouldn't be any debt if he just paid it out of pocket and recouped it back on the sale of the club after it was built.
I've not a clue what the situation is regarding Chelsea.It's taken Chelsea 13 years to do that, they've taken that long because he had to build them up. In 2003/4 he could afford to buy a new stadium so why did they wait 13 years?
This was a brief thought I had. Glad my insane theories aren't all THAT insane.i honestly dont get it, ...
hang on a minute,
maybe its the council holding US to ransom, 'yes you can have the land and the planning, but we want £5m a year for the priviledge' ?? we will have to finance it the way we (the council) decide.
SPV will lease the stadium from the developer/head lease holder 40 years at a time.The SPV will own the stadium. We will sub lease it from the SPV.
50k was in the document but this is far from final
No idea
Yes
This was a brief thought I had. Glad my insane theories aren't all THAT insane.
FFP Dark Magic in play here.
Played Farhad.
Whilst getting a piggyback from Axel Witsel.
The lower interest repayments through this structure would mean more matchday income (allowed revenue) going back into strengthening the playing squad. E.g. you can't have an investor plough money into the team but it can come via raised stadium incomeThe King's dock was over 20 years ago. We didn't have Moshiri to help us secure funding back then.
Everton Football Club as a business was not ever going to be able to secure those loans, either back then or now.
I'm not moaning either, who could moan about this? We're getting a new stadium at the docks, I'm made up! Doesn't mean I'm not interested in the details of the deal behind it, or that the finance deal can't be reviewed separately from the stadium.
You're right that it looks like a series of moves to circumvent high interest payments but you're absolutely speculating that this deal has anything to do with "input from a possible outsider (who isn't technically allowed to). There's nothing suggesting that this is more than LCC helping us secure beneficial interest rates for a very large loan.
I've no idea what you're getting at with the bit about "to circumvent ffp by allowing all matchday income to go to players/wages" because this deal has no impact on that. There's nothing in FFP that requires circumventing to spend the matchday income on players/wages. Losses incurred as a result of infrastructure investment are not calculated as part of FFP loss measurement. Additionally, FFP only considers the amount spent on players in terms of aggregated losses made over a 3-year period, it doesn't even look at wages. Wages are covered by the Premier League's Short Term Cost Control regulations and those rules specifically detail increases in non-broadcast revenue.