marty mcfly
Player Valuation: £40m
Unfortunately that's not something anyone can do anything about.Yet another reason for the focus to be on recapitalising the club not saddling it with debt funded refurbishment or new stadium.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfortunately that's not something anyone can do anything about.Yet another reason for the focus to be on recapitalising the club not saddling it with debt funded refurbishment or new stadium.
Unfortunately that's not something anyone can do anything about.
Sky get the subscription money and use that to pay the premier league. So yes indirectly we get subscription money.
It's a loss leader for BT, the advertising doesn't come close to paying for it. They're engaged in a war with sky over broadband subscribers, same as cable (it's the reason why cable dont get all the channels).
There's no guarantee this money will last, in fact it's more likely not to and it's the clubs that aren't reliant on it when it ends that will be in the best position to take advantage.
BT and Sky are persistently making complaints to OFFCOM about each other.
Sky used football to monopolise tv
entered broadband aggressively
So BT joined tv sport a counter punch
Unlike ESPN and Setanta BT have the finances to take on BSKYB as evidenced by them buying EE for 16billion.
Bt and sky hate each other. The big war is broadband and mobile 4g subscription. Football is a content to help them sell.
Bt and sky will continue to battle. Its only just starting up. Just SKY hasn't taken on a heavyweight before. Theyre used to KOing lightweights. Like setanta and ESPN
I would not call ESPN a lightweight, owned by Disney, a company worth 4 times that of BT.
Well the Board can either sell up, allow a new investor to inject capital or inject capital themselves.
They are the only options to move the club forward.
TA lid
Disney makes its money elsewhere
Way off topic, but go and check your facts, ESPN is a major contributor to Disney's revenues and profits accounting for approximately 15% of revenues.
ESPNs revenues dwarf Sky and BT.
Anyway, it's way off topic.
1. They can't sell up because no one will meet the valuation or then spend money to grow the club. Even if they sold for 100m it would still cost 600m to buy the board out, build the stadium and buy a top 4 capable team.Well the Board can either sell up, allow a new investor to inject capital or inject capital themselves.
They are the only options to move the club forward.
1. They can't sell up because no one will meet the valuation or then spend money to grow the club. Even if they sold for 100m it would still cost 600m to buy the board out, build the stadium and buy a top 4 capable team.
2. They could allow someone to inject the capital but since it would still cost around 500m that would mean it would dilute the rest of the shares down to around 20% at most. At that point the current shareholders since they would have no power over their investment would want bought out. See above.
3. They don't have 600m.
That's just the reality of the situation. There's nothing the board can do except give the club away and even then you still have to find someone willing to spend 500m.
Football if you're looking for a sugar daddy is a billionaire's game and we just don't look attractive with our old run down stadium.
As I said it still wouldn't matter.If they can't sell because no one will meet the valuation, maybe they should lower it.
Simple reason why it's not been sold, no one has met the asking price.