All three of those things.I'm sure he was joking. What exactly is it that makes him 'among the best chairmans in the league'? The fact he makes a decent speech once a season or the fact he was in the boys pen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All three of those things.I'm sure he was joking. What exactly is it that makes him 'among the best chairmans in the league'? The fact he makes a decent speech once a season or the fact he was in the boys pen?
Anyone taken into account that apart from the human element even if it were possible to do a CPO, could turn into a PR disaster - The People's Club doing what!
Where's the money coming from for the redevelopment?
Who pays for a new school to be built elsewhere (assuming that any redevelopment is to be based on Bullens Road side)?
What would be the costs of demolition and securing the site over the period of the build?
How long would the remaining residents be forced to live next to a building site?
Given that infrastructure is not great, why would you build it there?
If infrastructure is to be upgraded who pays?
I sort of get why there is allegedly no appetite for redevelopment (expansion) within the upper echelons of the club on considering the above.
Would I like to stay at Goodison - certainly, do I think it is more viable than a ground move - don't think so.
Or am I just being too negative?
Totally disagree. The bullens and Gwladys street are what make Goodison great. The other stands need demolishing.
Goodison is only unique and special to Evertonians no one else, and I Can't see what wider benefits it would bring, the stadium is all ready there, it's not like they would be building a new stadium where one didn't existed before. Around 40,000 people attend Goodison every 2 weeks and pubs and businesses have closed down in the area, don't get me wrong I'd love the old lady to be rebuilt but not at the expense of throwing people out of their homes who don't want to leave.
Hope this doesn't sound flippant or mad but given the current price per seat, the most cost effective thing to do is nothing except firstly upgrade hospitality and get it's pricing point correct so you maximise the occupancy and therefore the premium gained from it and secondly limit the amount of season tickets available. More day-trippers = higher prices.It'll come down to money in the end and how much it might cost to redevelop all, or part of Goodison compared to WHP to end up with roughly the same number of seats in both and the same amount of corporate gubbins.
Walton Hall Park isn't the greatest location so the secondary revenue drivers, like hotels and conferencing at some stadia probably aren't the earners they would have been for a city centre location.
A phased redevelopment of Goodison would be better from a capex cashflow perspective than building a new stadium, but while you're redeveloping you might have to accept some reduced capacity and, worse case, might even need to find somewhere else to play.
With limitless funds you'd build a shiny new stadium in either an ace location or somewhere ripe for regeneration and so maximise your non-matchday revenue. The chances of someone coming in with limitless funds isn't high though, so whoever takes us over ( I'm assuming it'll happen sooner or later ) will have been crunching the numbers and sucking on their pencils while scratching their heads
The latter isn't a euphemism ffs.
Swap "house" for "homes" mate, does it still not sound rude or disrespectful.Yes - a CPO can only be done on the basis of a wider benefits project. It's not as if any of those houses are anything unique or special (Goodison apart). That's not being rude or disrespectful but a house there could be swapped for a near identical one within a few hundred yards.
Agree on the Gwladys not being a priority. I sit there and love it. But it has no lounges and if we're to create some space and do something to improve the setting then, for me, that street can go as opposed to Goodison Rd.
Disagree with you on the Bullens stand though. To me it has history sure - but we'd keep that in the main stand. The views from a lot of the Bullens seats are terrible and it also has no hospitality.
I'd rather not do anything but if we're to move forward as a club - and a stadium move is out - then we don't have a lot of choice.
Here's one as mad as you like, but depending on the costs involved and if the site is big enough, may be a long term stroke of genius.Oh, and all you trying to foist the prawn sandwich eating bourgeoisie on to the Bullens, NO!
Goodison Park featured on The Chive's "Worst Views Available in Sports" Thread at #14
http://thechive.com/2015/11/03/the-worst-views-available-in-sports-bar-none-17-photos/#.lbrp0dk:gPJe
The bullens and Gwladys are completely unsuitable for a PL stadium that'll see the club through the next couple of generations. They're woefully inadequate now, so in another decade their own value would be their heritage.Totally disagree. The bullens and Gwladys street are what make Goodison great. The other stands need demolishing.
The park end is inadequate for a major team. It's a league one stand.The bullens and Gwladys are completely unsuitable for a PL stadium that'll see the club through the next couple of generations. They're woefully inadequate now, so in another decade their own value would be their heritage.
It's not enough that they hold memories and architectural interest, the simple facts are that they're inadequate.