"Facilities and attractions
A lake inhabited by carps, bream, tench, roaches and perches, ideal for anglers"
I can see there being a fair few objections to building on park land
Yes i agree a fair few objected to it and that was with the nonsense they spouted about enriching the whole Anfield area,talks are just talksA fair few objected to Liverpool planning to build on Stanley Park but they still got planning permission.
This is why the club has been 'in talks' with LCC so much. If it wasn't public parkland, LCC wouldn't be under any pressure to help us.
Exactly. Both clubs doing well on the pitch will undoubtedly to some extent benefit the City, due the fact it brings in extra revenue and highlights the city to those outside of the boundaries.A fair few objected to Liverpool planning to build on Stanley Park but they still got planning permission.
The Single Tier Park End was the fault of the previous board, not the current one.
It was Peter Johnson who rejected the idea of a two tier Park End, because he didn't think there was a need for it.
Yes i agree a fair few objected to it and that was with the nonsense they spouted about enriching the whole Anfield area,talks are just talks
Ill wait and see what comes out of the ongoing discussion with LCC
You say that like its a fact ,instead of your individual opinion. Kenwright had the vision but as we know not the money to make the dock a reality. Look at where Kenwright has taken us with very little money since the Peter Johnson Era. Its hard to argue its not progressed.
Peter Johnson actually wanted a two tier stand, but the plans and building work was too far gone. The board of Dr Marsh and a certain Bill Kenwright went for the cheap short term solution.
We needed 30 million for Kings Dock, he said the money was ring fenced.
It was. Fence was that high we could get access to it.
It all depends on how the park was donated to the Council and how important the park is to the Council's overall open spaces strategy. Croccy Park for example was given to the people of Liverpool by Lady Sefton (an American FYI US Blues). That can't be touched. But Walton Hall must be able to be used and they must not think it is worthy enough or used enough to keep. They may say Goodison needs to be turned in to a green space as recompenseI can see there being a fair few objections to building on park land
Johnson was the owner, he called the shots. Dr David Marsh had no power at all.
The Single Tier Park End was the fault of the previous board, not the current one.
It was Peter Johnson who rejected the idea of a two tier Park End, because he didn't think there was a need for it.
You say that like its a fact ,instead of your individual opinion. Kenwright had the vision but as we know not the money to make the dock a reality. Look at where Kenwright has taken us with very little money since the Peter Johnson Era. Its hard to argue its not progressed.