Next manager discussion (poll reset 21/05/2016)

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

Better than MoN mate

That would need something stronger

I'd have scout master Martin over not so Slick Jurgen any day of the week

 

[USABlue]

Klinnsmann isnt coming here, hes not leaving US soccer unless he gets sacked (which a fair amount of people want which says alot). Also hes just as stubborn as martinez and plays players out of position as well. If you didnt like martinez you wont like klinnsmann

 

[USABlue]

Im going to start drinking heavily daily if we get fabio cabello

 

[Thomasc]

Im going to start drinking heavily daily if we get fabio cabello

i'm sure he's past it now like, but he's one of the greatest club managers ever.

 

[Shu Ren Dennis Ng]

Going on win rates alone, Pellegrini would be the worse of the best but given he's managed almost double what Low, Villas Boas, Pereira, De Boer and Cocu have - it's hard to compare but still interesting to see.

Jose is in a league of his in comparison to the rest of them, I just can't get my head around why anyone wouldn't have him as our manager...

Koeman's record is better than I thought too.

One thing I like about Cocu (from what I read on wiki) is that it seems that he learns from his mistakes, took the failure in stride and bounced back. He is going to be a huge risk to take given how weak the Dutch league is and that he's with PSV.

Would love to see what he or De Boer can do in the far more competitive EPL. Heck, unless he drives us much lower down the table within his first few games/season, I would give him the same amount of time we gave Martinez just to be at the same level as we are now. I feel like he (Cocu) would be open to the idea of a mentoring coach like Wenger or Pellegrini too.

Again, HUGE risk. And given how reports about Moshiri wanting top level managers right away, very unlikely to happen.

 

[Toffeenick123]

Of those mentioned the most, their overall records look like this, obviously some can be misleading given some of the teams they've managed but overall:

In order of games managed:

Benitez managed 969 - win rate 51%
Mourinho managed 765 - win rate: 66%
Koeman managed 603 - win rate 55%
Pellegrini managed 600 - win rate: 52%
Low managed 337 - win rate: 54%
Villas Boas managed 298 - win rate 60%
Pereira managed 276 - win rate: 60%
De Boer managed 261 - win rate: 60%
Cocu managed 148 - win rate: 67%


And just for the record:

Moyes managed 845 - win rate 44%
Hughes managed 515 - win rate: 39.6%
Howe managed 373 - win rate 47%

Can you Martínez win rate?

 

[USABlue]

i'm sure he's past it now like, but he's one of the greatest club managers ever.

Just think hes been out of the club scene too long, also hasnt done much internatonally with england or russia.

 

[Shu Ren Dennis Ng]

i'm sure he's past it now like, but he's one of the greatest club managers ever.

Capello after Roma, yes all day. Capello after England, no all day.

 

[bluegirl]

Can you Martínez win rate?

Overall: managed 442 - win rate: 40%

 

[Thomasc]

Just think hes been out of the club scene too long, also hasnt done much internatonally with england or russia.

Yep, can't imagine there being much hunger there, which is one of the prerequisites for the job IMO.

 

[bluesteak]

erm....I'm saying we shouldn't appoint him

Sorry mate

 

[Toffeenick123]

Overall: managed 442 - win rate: 40%

Thanks Bluegirl. Seems that only Mark Hughes is worse.

 

[Toffeenick123]

Overall: managed 442 - win rate: 40%

Thanks Bluegirl. Seems that only Mark Hughes is worse.

 

[Coffee and TV]

Skybet have brought their Martinez market back, Martinez to leave has gone from 1/7 to 1/5 and Martinez to stay has gone from 4/1 to 100/30

 

[Papa Shango]

Thanks Bluegirl. Seems that only Mark Hughes is worse.

Its not a true accurate representation though. Different clubs in differing situations are not took into the equation.