Nothing has changed.

[kithnou]

Agreed, except they bucked the odds, driven by a certain individual who is now pulling the transfer strings for Everton.

Big net spend. Will do us good.

 

[Amw79]

Last five seasons net spend:

Liverpool £122M
Arsenal £206M
Chelsea £206M
United £369M
City £403M

...Spurs £1M...but over last decade £107M


THAT is why net spend is so important.

Want to be at the top table? Then this club's owners have to put their hands in their pocket and prove their ambition.

It's as simple as that.

Big net spends or we may as well have Kenwright back.

So on this basis we can only make a judgement on Moshiri's net spend in February 2021, or maybe even February 2026, to allow him the 5 years (or 10 years - as with Spurs) to look at his net spend over a longer period.

 

[Doolstar70]

Big net spend. Will do us good.

I really hope we do get a big net spend. Putting money into the team should of course improve us.

 

[Titus Bramble]

So on this basis we can only make a judgement on Moshiri's net spend in February 2021, or maybe even February 2026, to allow him the 5 years (or 10 years - as with Spurs) to look at his net spend over a longer period.

Or have a net spend this season somewhere between 24 and 80 million as that would be the average of one season as posted above. Not beyond he realms of possibility is it?

 

[kithnou]

I really hope we do get a big net spend. Putting money into the team should of course improve us.

People will notice. Will help next Summer. Perception is half the battle.

 

[vagant59]

WHAT WAS OUR NET SPEND IN THE 84,85,86,87 SEASONS

 

[banno]

Sell Rom for £20m and barkley for £15m and we will have the big net spend that everyone is pining for.

 

[roydo]

Net improvement.

 

[kithnou]

WHAT WAS OUR NET SPEND IN THE 84,85,86,87 SEASONS

We weren't in a rebuild of this size. We need a big turnover of talent now.

 

[toffee66]

Stating the obvious, how we spend is more important than what we spend. Spurs & Leicester both show there is more than one way to skin a cat. Obviously spending big, well is the best of all worlds...spending big, badly the worst.

 

[Amw79]

Or have a net spend this season somewhere between 24 and 80 million as that would be the average of one season as posted above. Not beyond he realms of possibility is it?

Excluding Spurs of course.

In last 2 windows wasn't the net spend around 20 - 25? So would seem to be on course to meet that average.

 

[ianefc]

Stop biting on this utter cretin. (I've spent way too long doing it)

If we do have a 'big' net spent he will simply go to the Koeman thread and start criticising him and that will be his next sanctuary of attention seeking.

I'd rather give the people concerned a chance and them let me down rather than spending all my time criticising them about things that may not happen.

Its pathetic. Hours of bitching on the internet from dawn until dusk, just be thankful you're not him. Enjoy life, worry about things worth worrying about IF they happen.

As you were.

 

[davek]

Errrr mate, Spurs have been the most consistent there for a few years and have a £1M net spend.

Your point is invalid

Read the post. Thanks.

 

[davek]

Interesting that you missed out Leicester from the figures.

Oh yeah. Therefore a poor net spend will always win trophies. then.

*sigh*

 

[davek]

Err that bull mate, all top 7 clubs have made a profit over the last 5 years so what you put is total rubbish as normal

Yes, it's all "bull"...and yet 99% of all top four slots and trophies go to those clubs that have large net spends.

There is NO way past that fact.