Nuclear Weapons Good/Bad

Nuclear Weapons Good/Bad

  • Good

    Votes: 5 10.9%
  • Bad

    Votes: 31 67.4%
  • Green nuclear cheese on radiated toast

    Votes: 10 21.7%

  • Total voters
    46


This one - "Three men jailed" and one is, and I can say this with almost 100% certainty, a Bulgarian.

Why can't we just have nice things for once and not be famous for drugs or other illegal things ffs
Oh you'll be alright, just blame the vietbong and move on. (That was a joke everyone, but if you want to get all snarky, please let peteblue know all about it)
 
Do reform know that Bulgaria has claimed a part of Derbyshire?
Well some of the Brexit propaganda did say that over 27 million filthy Bulgarians and Romanians would move to the UK so or something, so...

There is the small issue of that being larger than the population of both countries put together but you know, Brexit was a reasonable and normal situation.
 

Well some of the Brexit propaganda did say that over 27 million filthy Bulgarians and Romanians would move to the UK so or something, so...

There is the small issue of that being larger than the population of both countries put together but you know, Brexit was a reasonable and normal situation.
There were a few numerical errors associated with that grotesque act of self harm. But at least the people that voted for truss were happy, and after all, they're the ones that count the most.
 
There were a few numerical errors associated with that grotesque act of self harm. But at least the people that voted for truss were happy, and after all, they're the ones that count the most.
Yeah they look positively chuffed nowadays :lol:

To be on topic - how is this even a serious question though? "Nuclear weapons - good or bad" is literally "Exterminating people by the millions in seconds - good or bad". Take a guess like
 
Yeah they look positively chuffed nowadays :lol:

To be on topic - how is this even a serious question though? "Nuclear weapons - good or bad" is literally "Exterminating people by the millions in seconds - good or bad". Take a guess like
The attacks on Japan showed most deaths occurred in the fallout and then the wave of disease and hunger that followed the poisonings. Granted the two bombs used to end WWII are mere air rifle pellets compared to the super weapons technology has enabled today. The Nagasaki bomb being equivalent to a million tons of TNT or something like that.

America reaching the nuclear age first did have some benefits, it allowed them to police the world. It also had some drawbacks, in that America got to police the world. For projecting powers sake I see it as akin to britannia ruling the waves, brit empire was the biggest and baddest pirate gang and imposed it's will thereafter. The cutting edge of the day decides who gets the say so to speak.

A lot of people know about Chernobyl, and it is a fascinating and very sad story. The thing is, there's another disaster, it's so big it has three names... Kyshtym disaster, sometimes referred to as the Mayak disaster or Ozyorsk disaster. Occurred in 1957 and with the soviet policy of secrecy no one knew, not even half of the soviet government. Well worth a look. Plutonium enrichment facility. If you really fancy a downer, give the Murmansk submarine graveyard a look and see how casually lives were wasted in dealing with nuclear contamination there.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top