Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Goodison Park during reconstruction of the Main Stand early 1970s
The physical size of the stand was pretty imposing as were the two tiers and especially the escalators needed to get to the top all of which were new and modern. The blocked views by the new big square pillars were moaned about straight away by everyone I remember near me in my new seat. It was exciting to be in the front few rows because you were in a seat that felt nearer the pitch but the need to keep on stretching neck either side of the pillars was an immediate downer.When the rebuilt main stand was completed in 1971 how well received was it by the fans at the time. Did the atmosphere generated change significantly due to the limited standing area on that side of the ground.
Seems to me that the issue with restricted views increased as a result of the rebuild although there was cosiderable obstruction from the upper stand pre 1969.
Thanks for replying. I've often wondered why it was such a poorly designed rebuild at the time so many of the seats with either a poorly obstructed or restricted view which continues today to be an issue.The physical size of the stand was pretty imposing as were the two tiers and especially the escalators needed to get to the top all of which were new and modern. The blocked views by the new big square pillars were moaned about straight away by everyone I remember near me in my new seat. It was exciting to be in the front few rows because you were in a seat that felt nearer the pitch but the need to keep on stretching neck either side of the pillars was an immediate downer.
Main Stand during redevelopment 1970
Exactly right mate. As an 11 year old I was carried away by the newness of it all, we were champions and it all seemed natural that we just had ideas and made them come true. But my dad fumed from the word go that it was badly designed and not as good as Man Utd for example who were building new stands with no obstructions. The lack of space was a factor of course. Also rumours abounded that the cost influenced the decision to sell Alan Ball. It was big and grand but it was not in tune with the other stands and inexcusable even then to have view of goal mouth blocked by posts. On the point about whether the huge vocal support under the old stand was also lost I only have the sketchiest memory of noise coming from underneath the stand any way so cannot really say. My recollection was that main vocal support still came from two ends in terms of chants but sides produced that growling thunder which really made us a hostile place to visit.Thanks for replying. I've often wondered why it was such a poorly designed rebuild at the time so many of the seats with either a poorly obstructed or restricted view which continues today to be an issue.
Looking back at some other rebuilds done during the early 70s, the East Stand at Stamford Bridge was rebuilt for the start of the 1974 season. A three tier stand with a 11K capacity with no restricted views.
There must have been reasons for our Main Stand to be rebuilt the way it was I guess but I can't help thinking an opportunity missed not to get it right first time. I felt the same about the Park End rebuild years later which should surely have been a two tier design with some corporate hospitality boxes etc.
I wasn't around in 1970 but surely in a time when gate receipts were the main source of income then cost couldn't have been a massive issue for us . Statistics show that we had an average gate of almost 50k in 1970 (only United had higher), also in the previous decade Everton were the best supported club in England for two of those seasons-62/63 and 63/64,and not forgetting the huge cup crowds we had(many over 65k) in so many cup runs in the 60s, we couldn't have been short of cash back then.Exactly right mate. As an 11 year old I was carried away by the newness of it all, we were champions and it all seemed natural that we just had ideas and made them come true. But my dad fumed from the word go that it was badly designed and not as good as Man Utd for example who were building new stands with no obstructions. The lack of space was a factor of course. Also rumours abounded that the cost influenced the decision to sell Alan Ball. It was big and grand but it was not in tune with the other stands and inexcusable even then to have view of goal mouth blocked by posts. On the point about whether the huge vocal support under the old stand was also lost I only have the sketchiest memory of noise coming from underneath the stand any way so cannot really say. My recollection was that main vocal support still came from two ends in terms of chants but sides produced that growling thunder which really made us a hostile place to visit.
Just reading his book great reading how times have changed will post some pics when feeling a bit better my neck is still in jip!View attachment 26721
A young Gordon West
Bankrupt Chelsea that standFantastic pics of the main stand being built. Just shows what a shame and missed opportunity this was though, the way it was built with all the pillars was poor and on the cheap. Chelsea built their triple decker east stand just a couple of years later and showed how to do it properly.
When the new stand was completed, I was not a fan. I was a more reasonable minded twenty five year old, but nothing stopped me swapping my usual ' Road ' spec for the Lower Gwladys, where I have resided ever since, mainly due to the lack of atmosphere being generated.Exactly right mate. As an 11 year old I was carried away by the newness of it all, we were champions and it all seemed natural that we just had ideas and made them come true. But my dad fumed from the word go that it was badly designed and not as good as Man Utd for example who were building new stands with no obstructions. The lack of space was a factor of course. Also rumours abounded that the cost influenced the decision to sell Alan Ball. It was big and grand but it was not in tune with the other stands and inexcusable even then to have view of goal mouth blocked by posts. On the point about whether the huge vocal support under the old stand was also lost I only have the sketchiest memory of noise coming from underneath the stand any way so cannot really say. My recollection was that main vocal support still came from two ends in terms of chants but sides produced that growling thunder which really made us a hostile place to visit.