royalblue66
Player Valuation: £70m
Erm, hadn't seen that before, cheers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
Erm, hadn't seen that before, cheers.
Abraders
Player Valuation: £60m
That is far more of a foul than oumars imo
Old Blue 2
Player Valuation: £35m
Had he been pulled up about it at the time, instead of a penalty being awarded, it would have been a yellow card, end of. For pundits to suggest a retrospective ban is a joke. Not hearing the same thing about Kompany's foul on Vardy - I wonder why...?
And for too long defenders have got away with all manner of pushing and shoving in the penalty area. Well done the ref for not only spotting the intent, but also the offense. Carragher was the worst I've ever seen for getting away with blatant fouls in his own penalty area...
Both had minimal contact for me mate, both went down very, very easily.
Abraders
Player Valuation: £60m
I guess we see it a little differently, but for me there is far more grounds for a foul in that video.
Oumar just sees an arm coming out and completely starfished!
Titus Bramble
Best centre half to grace the Premier League
Fair play, his attitude is ace and he’s scored some important goals for us.
I still think I’m a better footballer though
I still think I’m a better footballer though
Hahahahahahahaha..............................................................
"Clattenburg believes the Toffees forward's actions will be the first incident reviewed by the FA Panel on Monday. He also called for Niasse to be punished - in what would be the first case of a player to be suspended for simulation."
"I’ve watched it from three angles and this is clear simulation," Clattenburg said. "Should be the first case for the FA panel to look at today. It should be the first case where a player is suspended for deceiving the referee into awarding a penalty."
Then there's this on Richarlison's dive the other week against Arsenal.
"Clattenburg, 42, says he would be very surprised if the incident was referred to the FA panel later today."
“It was the correct decision to award the penalty as there was contact between him and Hector Bellerin, that wasn’t initiated by the forward,” Clattenburg said."
“It is interesting because I’ve looked at three angles of the incident; the first one looks like nothing, there appears to be no contact,” he continued."
“The second also looks like no contact, but a third angle that I’ve studied shows Bellerin’s left leg hit the right leg of Richarlison."
“There is contact. We as referees cannot work out if that’s sufficient contact to award a penalty."
"Clattenburg believes the Toffees forward's actions will be the first incident reviewed by the FA Panel on Monday. He also called for Niasse to be punished - in what would be the first case of a player to be suspended for simulation."
"I’ve watched it from three angles and this is clear simulation," Clattenburg said. "Should be the first case for the FA panel to look at today. It should be the first case where a player is suspended for deceiving the referee into awarding a penalty."
Then there's this on Richarlison's dive the other week against Arsenal.
"Clattenburg, 42, says he would be very surprised if the incident was referred to the FA panel later today."
“It was the correct decision to award the penalty as there was contact between him and Hector Bellerin, that wasn’t initiated by the forward,” Clattenburg said."
“It is interesting because I’ve looked at three angles of the incident; the first one looks like nothing, there appears to be no contact,” he continued."
“The second also looks like no contact, but a third angle that I’ve studied shows Bellerin’s left leg hit the right leg of Richarlison."
“There is contact. We as referees cannot work out if that’s sufficient contact to award a penalty."
Last edited:
Exactly. They might want to take a look at Alexis Sanchez's performance at Goodison recently for some clearer examples of diving.
evertonarntwe
Player Valuation: £35m
to be fair mate he did dive, he was touched but not in a millions enough to send him to the ground, meaning he's went to ground on purpose, ie a dive
Toffe3m4n
Player Valuation: £80m
Diving would suggest you went down under no contact and deliberately made out like you did.
Niasse was barged - he could've fallen over and not made such a meal of the fall and we wouldn't even have to be talking about this.
Making a meal out of a fall =/= diving.
- Status