AsiaAsia82
Player Valuation: £35m
I just hope our very competent board are preparing other similar examples from other games to draw comparisons. This has been a calculated conspiracy to harm the mighty Oumar, our only striker...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a dive, you'd all be raging if it happened against us you bunch of kopites, nothing wrong with him being punished as long as they follow the precedent accordingly
Spot on.Yeah, but if the Ref was half decent he'd have seen it and given him a yellow card.
The ref didn't see it so he'll more then likely end up with a two match ban because the Ref was incompetent.
I know the answer is "Because we're Everton Lad", but why do we have to pay the price for incompetent officials?
Surely the Ref should get the two match ban instead for missing it?
Isn't it down to referees to call these accurately in the moment though? Isn't that what they're trained for??
Taking retrospective action because a referee felt that they were 'tricked' by a player in a moment is farcical. It completely shifts accountability away from them when they're already protected by the FA enough.
What's next? are players going to be punished for scoring goals when they were clearly offside just because the officials didn't catch it at the time? would you class that as 'deceiving' the officials by playing on??
Are you accusing evertonians of being child abusers ?boss fans aren't they, imagine that goes against us in the derby youse would all throwing digs at your kids and round housing your light bulbs
but it's for us and its the arl NAAAA DEFFO PEN THAT M8
fair enough he won a pen for it and we'll no doubt get one given against us to even it up, but saying it's not a dive is embarrassing. if that happens on a sunday league pitch he gets vollied for being a blurt
ethically speaking yes, but "contact" in any form has been used to discount diving before,
I don't think anyone is saying hes a saint here, but why is he the first sinner taken to task on it?
‘It wasn’t a dive he received contact’ So what!!!! A dive is putting yourself to the ground whether there was contact or not, which is exactly what he did.It wasn't a dive. He received contact, went down which he is within his right to do, didn't appeal and won a penalty which got us back into the game. He also then scored himself to level it up when, again, we were losing. He's also been arguably one of our better, more hard-working players recently.
So, again, don't chat bollocks.
Excuse me?boss fans aren't they, imagine that goes against us in the derby youse would all throwing digs at your kids and round housing your light bulbs
The rules have changed this year for retrospective action. Come on lar let’s be all kopitey over it. He simulated.But the punishment for Diving is a yellow. Fair enough, stick a yellow on his record.
How can they justify a 2 match ban because the Ref didn't see it?
It wasn't a dive. He received contact, went down which he is within his right to do, didn't appeal and won a penalty which got us back into the game. He also then scored himself to level it up when, again, we were losing. He's also been arguably one of our better, more hard-working players in recent times.
So yeah, let's give him a severe punishment for that.
Again... don't chat bollocks.
Doesn’t work like that man. Come on let’s not be so salty.Surely the Wrestling Thread would be a much more suitable place to discuss this horrific assault on Niasse
Fair enough I look forward to all those offside Goals against us being retrospectively wiped of the record as well.
My thoughts exactly. See it every time I watch football on telly. So why now and why us?Ridiculous decision - just wonder how much Clattenburgs comments influenced the descision.
Everton should gather videos of other similar incidents which didnt render suspension and file it to FA together with an appeal.