2017/18 Oumar Niasse

[Milkman]

Lads we’re not the victims and there is no conspiracy here.

You’re also blues not kopites. Think on.

Don't think anybody is seriously claiming a conspiracy mate, merely pointing out the inconsistency from pundits and officials.

 

[JLW]

Don't chat bollocks. Jesus christ..

Why??? Should we pat him on the back??

 

[chicoazul]

Come on lads don’t morph into simulation technical body language experts now. It’s clear he’s snided the defender for a penno.

 

[nikom court]

the fa are awaiting further reports,so they can get the ban to cover the derby as the dive was so bad.

 

[sageyefc]

Why??? Should we pat him on the back??

Yes

 

[Abraders]

Come on lads don’t morph into simulation technical body language experts now. It’s clear he’s snided the defender for a penno.

I am bewildered at the lack of honesty running around in this thread right now.

It's so so so so blatantly a dive

 

[Toffe3m4n]

Well they don't say charged for diving so I don't think a definition of that is needed. They say he is charged for "Successful Deception of a Match Official" which considering he goes to ground under what looks like barely any contact seems to be bang on.

Although it is very difficult to be 100% sure on any cases apart from the diving with no contact.

Isn't it down to referees to call these accurately in the moment though? Isn't that what they're trained for??

Taking retrospective action because a referee felt that they were 'tricked' by a player in a moment is farcical. It completely shifts accountability away from them when they're already protected by the FA enough.

What's next? are players going to be punished for scoring goals when they were clearly offside just because the officials didn't catch it at the time? would you class that as 'deceiving' the officials by playing on??

 

[chicoazul]

Don't think anybody is seriously claiming a conspiracy mate, merely pointing out the inconsistency from pundits and officials.

And if it happened against us Milko? Exactly man. I applaud the FA for showing some cajones.

 

[JLW]

Yes

For??

 

[billyblue80]

It was a dive, you'd all be raging if it happened against us you bunch of kopites, nothing wrong with him being punished as long as they follow the precedent accordingly

They won't

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

Lou I agree mate, but I hate diving more than anything in the game, it’s embarrassing that grown men throw themselves to ground like that.

Hate all the diving lark myself mate, and I would have been spitting feathers if that decision been made against us.

 

[Blue 1]

Shame he's being made an example of when there's been plenty worse this season which seem to have gone under the radar, but that's this season for you.

Gonna have to take it on the chin though if we want to see anything done about this type of snidery.

 

[Abraders]

Tbf though, Niasse being banned will not be great news for Palace as we have Hammers coming up. They'd want us to beat them right?

 

[sageyefc]

For??

For being oumar

 

[Lord Buckethead]

Come on lads don’t morph into simulation technical body language experts now. It’s clear he’s snided the defender for a penno.

Yeah, but if the Ref was half decent he'd have seen it and given him a yellow card.
The ref didn't see it so he'll more then likely end up with a two match ban because the Ref was incompetent.

I know the answer is "Because we're Everton Lad", but why do we have to pay the price for incompetent officials?
Surely the Ref should get the two match ban instead for missing it?