![]()
Anyone saying he dived can put their apologies below. Ta x.
He dived
![]()
Anyone saying he dived can put their apologies below. Ta x.
What a kangaroo court.
Use your eyes mate, clear contact there.He dived
I'd muff dive ya MaaHe dived
![]()
Anyone saying he dived can put their apologies below. Ta x.
The FA have now set the standard. If they stick to it and dish out punishment to simialr offences then fair enough but i would be surprised we see another player punished this season
Sound. It's not a dive.This wording below is perhaps the best description of what the word diving is meant in football terms
In association football, diving is an attempt by a player to gain an unfair advantage by falling to the ground and possibly feigning an injury, to give the impression that a foul has been committed. Dives are often used to exaggerate the amount of contact present in a challenge. Deciding on whether a player has dived is often very subjective, and one of the most controversial aspects of football discussion. Players do this so they can receive free kicks or penalty kicks, which can provide scoring opportunities, or so the opposing player receives a yellow or red card, giving their own team an advantage. Diving is also known as simulation (the term used by FIFA), and Schwalbe (German for swallow).
Only just read this so apologies if its already been featured here. You might know this ta-ta of a referee would have chimed in early doors about it.
What a motley crew of self opinionated soundbiters had obviously gathered by Sunday evening by all accounts. Pity sub iudice laws re media comments dont apply to F.A. Kangaroo Courts. Clattenburg has evidently picked up his forensic expertise of diving during his holidays with the Gerrards
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/everton-striker-niasse-to-fight-dive-charge-dh977sdtb
Writing in The Times on Sunday, Mark Clattenburg, the former Premier League referee, said he felt that it was a clear
dive. “I’ve watched it from three angles and this is clear simulation,” Clattenburg said. “It should be the first case where a player is suspended for deceiving the referee into awarding a penalty.
“There’s no touch on the leg and Oumar Niasse’s action — he has thrown himself backwards — is not consistent with contact from the defender. The only action you are then trying to find as a referee is a clear shirt-pull as, if you touch the player in the chest, he would not fall back like that. If the system is fair and correct, this is a prime example which should result in a suspension.”