For me, I feel the board get too much of the blame. While I don't think they have done as well as they could have, they have always listened to the fans.
It's clear that had we appointed Moyes when we could have got him on 2 occasions, the majority were against the appointment and preffered a flash European manager. A lot were hung up on how Moyes left and couldn't get beyond their personal vendettas. I'm absolutely certain that had we got Moyes we would have a similar strength team to West Ham right now and would be battling in Europe like they are. We needed that period of stability to set the structure of the team and then perhaps could have got someone better down the line.
Nearly all the decisions from the board on manager sackings and appointments were agreed with by the fans. Silva, koeman, Ancelotti, Dyche, Lampard, the sackings of Benitez and Allardyce too. And it was the majority of the fans who didn't want Moyes back. So why should the board be accountable for that and not the fans?
Why is it that Everton hate their board, Spurs hate their board, West ham hate their board, man utd hate their board. Bit of a trend here isn't there. People just like to look for scapegoats and always think the grass will be greener by changing.
So would we really be better off with an American type model where they take money out regularly for personal gain or the next Todd boehly circus? I think the people above at Everton right now are somewhere in the middle. They aren't the masterminds at Brentord or Brighton which we would love to see, but they also aren't as bad as some others who take money from their club and have no interest in the club.