That's 2 articles that I wholeheartedly agree with in the last 48 hours (the other being ijjysmith's for the city game preview).
I thought the Stones "incident" was all about the way he is really, a unbelievably confident young man. I think if we were flying with the wins we should have had then the "incident" wouldn't have caused a ripple, or at least not a negative ripple. Everyone would be crowing about how ace he is, instead the Park End were, probably, understandably, expecting a feck up, another late goal and more dropped points. His reaction was telling, calm down, but probably calm down, because the more we get anxious as a crowd the more it will transfer onto the pitch, after all they are human beings, albeit very rich ones.
On another point I thought this was the first game in a while that Martinez deserves some credit, his substitutions worked. It's been a while since I could say that, maybe as long ago as his first season in charge. I think he is a decent manager, he is not the uber failure that some would have us believe but he's not the messiah that we probably all thought he was after his first season.
As the article says, February is pivotal for us Blues, but for Martinez in particular. If it's a good one he gets some of the goodwill back if not it's fume time for that Wigan failure/fraud/beaut etc etc etc.
COYB