Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Phasing out Heading from Football - Yay or Nay?

Should heading be phased out of football?

  • No

    Votes: 6 9.2%
  • NOOOOOOOO

    Votes: 59 90.8%

  • Total voters
    65
Status
Not open for further replies.

Sport shouldn't involve the participants being permanently damaged as a matter of course.
I mean I cant imagine the number of drugs those cyclists go through does them a world of good, but.

My point is, Boxers know the risks, footballers also, those people who do the land speed records also.

Sport carries risk, eating peanuts carries risk, its a matter of choice really isnt it.
 
I mean I cant imagine the number of drugs those cyclists go through does them a world of good, but.

My point is, Boxers know the risks, footballers also, those people who do the land speed records also.

Sport carries risk, eating peanuts carries risk, its a matter of choice really isnt it.
No, I don't suppose it does, but then taking drugs in cycling is technically illegal. You might also draw comparison with the mandatory wearing of helmets, which was introduced after a couple of riders died after crashing. Is that worth the risk as well or is a pretty simple measure to reduce that risk worthwhile?

Regarding your second point, I reckon the proportion of footballers who have read the research into dementia and heading is practically zero.

I see parallels with rugby, which has obvious issues with concussion and brain injuries. While it remains to be seen if the measures they've introduced have made a difference, they have at least tried to address it rather than brush it under the carpet and say "head shots are just part of the game, get on with it."
 

No, I don't suppose it does, but then taking drugs in cycling is technically illegal. Regarding your second point, I reckon the proportion of footballers who have read the research into dementia and heading is practically zero.

I see parallels with rugby, which has obvious issues with concussion and brain injuries. While it remains to be seen if the measures they've introduced have made a difference, they have at least tried to address it rather than brush it under the carpet and say "head shots are just part of the game, get on with it."
If footballers havent read the research, I get that, but im assuming that football clubs medical teams have.
 
He knew the risks though, surely?

Well no Bruce, you yourself have just said its new research, so his age group wont have known the risks.

But you have to be a certain kind of stupid to know that repeatedly banging your head hard into something wont give you some sort of long term damage.
 
Well no Bruce, you yourself have just said its new research, so his age group wont have known the risks.

But you have to be a certain kind of stupid to know that repeatedly banging your head hard into something wont give you some sort of long term damage.
As I said above though, you're not going to get people individually saying "I'm not going to head the ball, thanks very much...", it would take a collective change across the entire sport, like we've seen with rugby. If it was down to the clubs to not play players for a bit after any concussion then it would never happen because no player is going to volunteer for that.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top