Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

  • Participation within this subforum is only available to members who have had 5+ posts approved elsewhere.

Phasing out Heading from Football - Yay or Nay?

Should heading be phased out of football?

  • No

    Votes: 6 9.2%
  • NOOOOOOOO

    Votes: 59 90.8%

  • Total voters
    65
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's a silly argument Goat. No one complains about wearing a seat belt or that air bags destroy the driving experience, but both make driving safer to do. I don't need our players ballsing their brains up for my entertainment.
That’s great MP argument stuff Bruce. Attempt to ridicule the question rather than answer it.
You don’t mind them breaking their legs? tearing their ligaments, having on pitch heart attacks? Some rules necessary to counter the effects of those? No tackling? No running?
 
As per @MikelsGoat boxing carries a risk - a much bigger one, but people still do it. Any kind of motorsport, or anything to do with horses and we could go on. Kids play football in the park for the fun of it and will still head balls.

They've reduced heading in training and banned underage groups from it altogether, this seems sensible. How sanitised do you want life to try and rule out injuries almost completely? We're talking about people in their seventies/eighties getting dementia, that could just be a result of longer lives and they would have had it regardless. I'm not saying it doesn't increase the factor in getting dementia as that is fairly clear but we don't know what is going on in our ticking time bombs we call our bodies. I would also like to see the results of people who are in their 40's/early 50's before we do anything as drastic as banning heading altogether. We all know the footballs that Booby Charlton and Co used to head are nothing like the ones of today.
I don't much care for boxing, but I'd imagine the use of the headwear they use in the Olympics would reduce the impact of blows to the head. If it's as simple as giving people a cap to wear so they can head the ball a bit more safely then that's no different to kitting people out with shinpads IMO. I don't get why people are so up in arms about wanting to protect people's mental health.
 
I don't much care for boxing, but I'd imagine the use of the headwear they use in the Olympics would reduce the impact of blows to the head. If it's as simple as giving people a cap to wear so they can head the ball a bit more safely then that's no different to kitting people out with shinpads IMO. I don't get why people are so up in arms about wanting to protect people's mental health.
I don’t think they are Bruce. They are up in arms about banning heading.
 
That’s great MP argument stuff Bruce. Attempt to ridicule the question rather than answer it.
You don’t mind them breaking their legs? tearing their ligaments, having on pitch heart attacks? Some rules necessary to counter the effects of those? No tackling? No running?
Well there have been various changes to the laws of the game to make the kind of tackles commonly seen in the past a straight red card offence (and many did complain that the game had gone soft as a result). Personally speaking, I would love to see the game do much more to outlaw the use of cortisone and other painkillers that are liberally used to get players on the field when they really shouldn't be as that has been well proven to cause all manner of arthritis type problems in later life.

I don't believe the heart attack issue is comparable. Half of the England world cup winning team developed dementia. I don't recall half of them dying on the pitch from a heart attack.
 

I don't much care for boxing, but I'd imagine the use of the headwear they use in the Olympics would reduce the impact of blows to the head. If it's as simple as giving people a cap to wear so they can head the ball a bit more safely then that's no different to kitting people out with shinpads IMO. I don't get why people are so up in arms about wanting to protect people's mental health.
The thinking behind not giving them head gear is that some players will think they are invincible and go around heading peoples feet.
 

It was in that piece you posted @Bruce Wayne

Offering padded helmets to players is not a solution, he said, since “when you put protective headgear on people and take away that pain sensation, people are more inclined to put their heads in the wrong place”.

It's why we feel pain, so as to no what to avoid.

You made your point perfectly with your first post regarding boxing. It's educated risk - as long as these players know what they're signing up for, then let them get on with it, just like boxing, MMA etc.

Hell, horse riding or a somersault in gymnastics or skateboarding might break your neck, nobody HAS to do these things but people still should have the choice to do it. It's called living.
 
It would alter the DNA of the game too adversely. I’m all for mitigation of the risks as much as possible, but beyond a certain point - especially for people who have chosen to do it professionally - it’s part of the game and if you don’t like the potential negatives nobody is forcing you to play.
 
Which has been proven to cause dementia, ergo, being able to head the ball with no protection is more important to you than the player's mental health.

I have yet to see the proof that heading a ball directly causes dementia. What HAS been shown is that footballers have developed dementia, and that footballers head balls. My mother-in-law gradually lapsed into dementia, and ended up completely out of everything. There must be millions who have suffered from dementia who have never played football in their life...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top