6 + 2 Point Deductions


So, the Forest commission does not know why we got "three extra points deducted" but assumes "some part" of these is related to "incorrect information" - yet the Everton commission appeal board said we acted in good faith.

Forest are over nearly twice as much as us, and yet we end up with a 33% extra penalty.

And Everton fans are supposed to believe our treatment is not disproportionate and/or corrupt?

On this basis, the interim Everton board - if we even have one - should resign en masse.
Our breach is 19% of the threshold while Forrests is 57%! The Forrest decision is clear that the SIZE of the breach was their primary concern.
 
Hope to feck some one from Everton is fuming as much as i am. That report is a proper kick in the danglers and has to be acted upon. Take legal action against the corrupt helmets ffs Everton. Grow a pair for once in your life.
We'll just let the PL spank our bare bottoms and be 'satisfied ' with it.
 
They've really made a rod for their own back with the nonsense they put in these report summaries. We were found not to have misled and therefore got our penalty reduced to 6. Forest are found not to have misled and therefore get a reduction from 6 points to 4 citing Everton who were found to have misled. They could at least read their own stuff.
 

Yes just saw that now , after I posted.

Completely lost for words.

Everton have to bring a separate legal action ( unless they have been given a nod and wink that the 2nd breach will result in a slap on the wrist)

Whats your prediction Jazzy?
 
If mitigations have already been factored in and have got the sanction reduced to 4, what exactly is going to form the basis of this apparent “appeal”?
Appeal: Dear Mr Masters, a reminder that we are not everton.
Appeal result: Successful Points fully restored, an addition 30 point deduction for everton for simply existing.
 

Top