Potential Lukaku replacements?

[Toast]

Lukaku isn't even that good, if his injuries weren't an issue I'd take Sturridge over him any day.

It's a trap.

 

[Sapie88]

You need to take a wee look at yourself, Sturridge over Lukaku.

Sturridge is vastly superior in every department except fitness, if he'd have had a full season he'd have out scored Lukaku easily, proven by 8 goals in 14 appearances.

He's a lot better and you're all overrating Lukaku.

 

[Goat]

Hmmmm.

Sturridge 26 232 apps 91 goals a goal every 2.54 games
Lukaku 23 278 119 goals a goal every 2.33

1 dances like a tw and is made of straws and the other wont shut his horrible mouth and is lazy.

Only 1 will be sold for 65m this Summer tho.

 

[Sapie88]

Hmmmm.

Sturridge 26 232 apps 91 goals a goal every 2.54 games
Lukaku 23 278 119 goals a goal every 2.33

1 dances like a tw and is made of straws and the other wont shut his horrible mouth and is lazy.

Only 1 will be sold for 65m this Summer tho.

Exactly so let's invest that extra money on a better striker.

 

[Goat]

Exactly so let's invest that extra money on a better striker.

Do you mean Milik?

 

[Sapie88]

Do you mean Milik?

We could get Milik and Sturridge.

 

[Goat]

We could get Milik and Sturridge.

But the dancing mert?

Think about the dancing.

 

[Sapie88]

But the dancing mert?

Think about the dancing.

He'll leave that behind for the meffs over the park, we'll get him to do something else.

 

[eurosrees]

Can't believe people think Wilfried Bony is a suitable replacement for Lukaku, he is bloody rubbish.

 

[Sapie88]

Can't believe people think Wilfried Bony is a suitable replacement for Lukaku, he is bloody rubbish.

Studger or nothing for me.

 

[CahillsCornerFlag]

Burn the striking department down to the ground and start again. 3 needed for me as none of them are either a/ staying, b/ good enough, or c/ good enough & a bit domestic abusey. Deulofeu and Barkey can already provide the assists if they're allowed to flourish under a new manager.

Milik, Batshuayi, and Lacazette.

 

[Caolam]

Sturridge is vastly superior in every department except fitness, if he'd have had a full season he'd have out scored Lukaku easily, proven by 8 goals in 14 appearances.

He's a lot better and you're all overrating Lukaku.

I don't think I am over rating Lukaku, he is up there with the top scorers in the Premiership while playing for a team in the bottom half of the league. That makes him pretty good in my opinion.
The only thing that 8 goals in 14 games proves is that he scored 8 goals in 14 matches, you cannot extrapolate 30 goals in a full season. He may have but he may not.
Anyway the issue is mute as he is injury prone

 

[Goat]

Burn the striking department down to the ground and start again. 3 needed for me as none of them are either a/ staying, b/ good enough, or c/ good enough & a bit domestic abusey. Deulofeu and Barkey can already provide the assists if they're allowed to flourish under a new manager.

Milik, Batshuayi, and Lacazette.

Sweet baby jesus.

 

[CahillsCornerFlag]

Sweet baby jesus.

This thread was already down the FM rabbit hole, I just went full Lewis Carroll.

 

[bluestevon]

Burn the striking department down to the ground and start again. 3 needed for me as none of them are either a/ staying, b/ good enough, or c/ good enough & a bit domestic abusey. Deulofeu and Barkey can already provide the assists if they're allowed to flourish under a new manager.

Milik, Batshuayi, and Lacazette.

Same a swhat i said mate, we need two 'relatively' proven ones and one with huge potential

Any club buying Lacazette should buy Fekir as well, his scoring rate when Fekir was out injured with his cruciates plummeted massively, by alla ccounts they are a VERY good partnership together