TheBlueGibbon
Player Valuation: £40m
Unusual for the club to announce the fee, excluding Deulofeu, the OS lists all the deals back to Cahill as undisclosed or nominal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Me too. Does that make us geeks?
Just to over geek it, wasn't that Lennon's number last season?
Whoa, how did the press get that fee so spectacularly wrong?? Have we made it public to deflect any impending criticism over our shoddy spending?
just got in and seen the story, could anyone shed some light on the fee please? does anyone think we did actually pay £6m, but this is the board pretending to add an extra £3m due to the banner and the fact we're not making the big money signing?
Me too. Does that make us geeks?
Just to over geek it, wasn't that Lennon's number last season?
Unusual for the club to announce the fee, excluding Deulofeu, the OS lists all the deals back to Cahill as undisclosed or nominal.
It looks like it's been inflated in the media for PR purposes ("look, we spend money too').Unusual for the club to announce the fee, excluding Deulofeu, the OS lists all the deals back to Cahill as undisclosed or nominal.
It looks like it's been inflated in the media for PR purposes ("look, we spend money too').
I suppose next years accounts will clarify it.
If there's outgoings they'll probably use the 'undisclosed' option to mask exactly how much is clawed back.
That all said, if the get Lennon + a playmaker in today too I'm not arsed which way they cut it.
Maybe they wanted other clubs to know the fee, for later transfer dealings. "Skint Everton just paid 9.5m on a defender, which means now they cannot meet the 16m demands for yarmolenko, so we'll have to accept the 12m they've offered."Yep. They certainly wanted us to know the fee. The cynic in me can guess why.
Roll on 5pm to see if I'm right eh?