Looking at how the owner and the club are behaving I wouldn`t be surprised if they negotiated 4 points for non appeal, but then appealed anyway.
I think our IC for the second charge said the Forest IC made a mistake, it should have been 8-2=6 rather than 6-2=4, all the legal guys I`ve listened to think if they do a recount they will get points added rather than removed and can see no mitigating grounds where points should be removed.
Unlike the Everton case where we got 1 point back for Co-operation AND the Ukraine war but Forest got 2 points back for co-operation. In the appeal if they give us the same co-operation as Forest and increase Ukraine war to 1 point, that means those 2 points should be coming back to us. In the interest of fairness.
I can see a world where we get 2 given back and Forest, especially after their media rampage on officials, get 2 more removed for the co-operation. On top of all that the PL are now investigating Forest for their tweets etc, there is rules in the PL handbook for points deduction for discipline breaches so they could be even more deducted. Remember Everton as a club wasn`t retweeting the corrupt stuff, it was all the fan groups.