Some of the “football finance experts” (who in my opinion spout more crap than fans as they often haven’t bothered to read charges/reports) are sticking their head above ground to suggest Forests breach is less than our first one, that their mitigation is the Johnson thing, and even read that they should get a tiny points penalty because they removed the sporting advantage by selling their best player.
Thats makes no sense as the sporting advantage of overspending occurs over the 3 year period, not after. But they haven’t once said they will robustly defend their position etc. I think they are comfortable. We need to win games or go down. No ifs or buts. No advantage is going to come out of this next round of charges. The more points we chuck away on the pitch, the more SuperSilks 4 points seems a bit of a crappy haul given how many arguments in our favour.