TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
Yes?Lookman is crap mate and he’s the same age as Richarlison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes?Lookman is crap mate and he’s the same age as Richarlison.
You mean Thank God the rest of football doesnt ignore Penos?Nah you're getting there.
While we're on the penalties thing thank God we put Richarlison on them. Probably an extra 10m because he scored 10 instead of 7.
Indeed. That's why we were fighting relegation. He sets a fairly mediocre bar.…he’s our best player in the scheme of things, I imagine he’s the one player Lampard wants to keep.
Smart teams definitely ignore them when deciding who to buy. But football is still filled with dumb dumbs.You mean Thank God the rest of football doesnt ignore Penos?
Phew, right.
Yes?
Indeed. That's why we were fighting relegation. He sets a fairly mediocre bar.
I'd be happy for him to stay (one of only two that applies to) - but I'm not joining in the "Robbie has left Take That" hysteria that's pock-marking this thread. He's nothing special in terms of Evertonian history and still wouldn't make the top five Everton players of the last 20 years - which is saying something as it was a largely mediocre era. But to read this thread, Dixie is waving goodbye.
Mate its widely accepted amongst the fanbase that as a team we staved our attacking talent of goal scoring chances.Smart teams definitely ignore them when deciding who to buy. But football is still filled with dumb dumbs.
Man United buy Richarlison for example. How many penalties is he scoring there? You just bought a 7 goal scorer for your team even if he scored 10 for Everton.
Yeah I agree, but I also would put Lookman in that basket which I'm sure you disagree with. It's not a compliment for Lookman so much.Just wanted to throw that in there.
I actually do think Richarlison is overrated and not good enough to play for some of the clubs people seem to think he’ll walk into on here for some reason. He is an effective player for a club of our level though.
Where are you based Bigman?Yeah man Lookman scored a goal every 240 minutes and Richarlison had one every 250. Is dividing goals by minutes played advanced stats over there? I learned division when I was 9.
We may find a better player than him, though. That's what recruitment is for.
I like the lad - but, meh. He's not all that in the grand scheme of things.
Fair. Also the games where Richarlison is a wide player he's as much the cause of this as the victim.Mate its widely accepted amongst the fanbase that as a team we staved our attacking talent of goal scoring chances.
We had about 15 games this season where we didnt create a single chance PER 90.
Lookman is crap.Yeah man Lookman scored a goal every 240 minutes and Richarlison had one every 250. Is dividing goals by minutes played advanced stats over there? I learned division when I was 9.
Yeah I agree, but I also would put Lookman in that basket which I'm sure you disagree with. It's not a compliment for Lookman so much.
I do too. It's also concerningly close sometimes.I think Richarlison is better than Lookman like.
Yeah I agree, but I also would put Lookman in that basket which I'm sure you disagree with. It's not a compliment for Lookman so much.