Mate -
Sincerely, you're a good & determined poster, but I'm genuinely not sure as to whether there's an element of you being deliberately flippant about some points made now. I'm not wholly getting how you've stated numerously that you're 'on the fence' when - it seems via the content of your scribbles at least - that you're very PRO RM (which is fine of course) based on, well, the very fact you seem to discount a lot of other folks arguments by defending him hugely and at almost every opportunity. It's like a kind of footballing variation of PASCAL's WAGER as you'll oft then go on to add that you expect him to be slung next season?
You're a bright guy, obv, but you seem to be a tad hung up on the BAINES quotes and their meaning/delivery also...all that. Irrelevant, it has been said, has offered insight and has without question set a ball rolling.
Where it lands is anyone's guess.
But if it shakes things up....SOUND...I for one can't knock it 'cos it needs shaking ATM.
I'm usually just responding to quite varied attempts to dismiss what I've said as nonsense. If it sounds flippant it's because it does become difficult to repeat why you think something again and again. Especially when you find the angle suddenly gets changed to one that's almost the opposite of what someone else has said to attack the manager. It also may sound flippant because other people may be more heated about the situation. Which is fair enough. Although I've learnt not to mistake anger for passion. They aren't always the same thing. That's not a personal comment towards yourself by the way. More just that because I am repeating things calmly doesn't mean I don't care more than some others who seem to be habitually angry.
I've stated where I stand on Martinez and it may just seem totally pro when compared to some arguments that seem to believe everything is down to him.
That's a big warning sign to me about whether a decision on the manager is being made with a clear head.
If you want a discussion on his pros and cons I've engaged with that when asked. But to be clear again. I like the fact that he's lookin for a more progressive style of play. I like the kind of player he's looking to bring in. I like that there's focus on players being bought in to fit in a few years down the line.
I don't think he's gone about how he's introduced players into the first team in a very pragmatic way. I don't think he's worked enough on a plan b or effective setpieces. I don't think he communicates his intentions very well to the fans.
Ultimately I think what is happening in terms of the squad is providing promise that wasn't there under Moyes but I'm not convinced he has a wide enough range of man management skills to make the most of the squad he'll end up with.
So no confusing opinion. Just one that isn't dominant on here for now. Do you really think we need another voice finding fault with everything he does.
As far as Baines goes, I love the lad and if I thought he'd been genuinely put down then I'd be defensive of him. But it's a genuine opinion that if I'd had my words used in a way that could have potentially disrupted my work then it is only the people who did that I'd take issue with.
My feelings are there is little or no rift and all we'll see is the player a lot less likely to talk to the press. And that's their fault. Everything they've done since reeks of defensive guilt.
And if people believed in the player then they should maybe consider whether they are right about who it is exactly whose put him in this situation rather than automatically use him as a way of attacking the manager. As I keep hearing there is enough ammunition already.