Look at the league table then look at that spending table from the summer window. Apart from City's position the rest does not match up at all. When Leicester and Spurs both spend less than us but make the top 4 then this 'we're doing as well as we should be based on spending' does not add up.
If the financial argument is true (teams finish where their finding dictates). Then the only logical implication is that managers like Ranieri Pochettino even Moyes are very good (for out performing their financial league position) whereas Martinez is average. Finances are a great argument for absolving managers of poor performance but when you take it to its logical conclusion you are saying that you could have any qualified coach in charge and we'd still come in the same position roughly.
Of course finances as a whole are important but in this case they don't excuse the manager from gross underperformance over the last 20 months.
Never said they did - from a finance perspective I was simply responding to the thought that we could go and buy any quality player with premier league experience we wanted because there is more money. That he chooses to build through a core of young players that allow for growth and potential sell on value if we do lose them is still important from an Everton business model perspective. Our purchasing power within the league has remained static or fallen because teams like Bournemouth, Palace have attracted additional investment to go along with the additional sky money.
Martinez has made mistakes no doubt. Last year we underperformed in the league, no argument. We are currently not where any of us would like to be this year but I have definitely seen improvement from last. To me that means he is learning. We have had one good cup run and in the running for another. I look at last year as a learning year for him. I think he was learning how to manage in Europe - (first Time), he was learning how to manage the bulk of his players coming back from a world cup (first time - Wigan were crap) I think it is fair to say we all might cock-up a job when experiencing two pretty material challenges in the same year. One that impacts your preparation for the year and the other that impacts your management of resources in the year. Yes the blame falls to Martinez (and to the players as well) but I am not going to sack a guy that doesn't nail every challenge the first time he experiences it. The biggest justifiable criticism I have is sticking with Howardas long as he did. Do managers generally cut goalies more slack because they see a goalie is always judged by the fans on number of goals conceded, probably, when they might see 3-4 errors on film leading up to it that impacted the result).
I don't pay much attention to his wording in press conferences TBH - both in slating players by name (how'd that work for Mourhino) or using certain words consistently. I know that if I spoke a second language I would probably sound like a melt as well to a native speaker by constantly using the same words I was comfortable with.