Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not just some journalist, it's Joyce. Over the last few years he has very rarely got anything wrong in regards to our transfer activity. He is often the first person to break big news.
And also Romero's wife sulking on twitter strongly suggest we went for Romero.
But either way I think you are right Olsen has been brought in the to achieve the same outcome that Romero would have. Which is to give Pickford a kick up the arse. I'm not confident it will work, but we now have a safer pair of hands if Pickford's form continues to be disastrous.
Maybe despite what I thought the money was not there or at least allowed to be spent .Thats exactly what this feels like to me. Even if it's not Donnarumma Brands will be focussed on getting a first choice starter in that area. Its the glaring area now.
Plan A was clearly Pickford just sees out the season. However he keeps fluffing his lines. We seem to have got a reliable backup, who at least from his stats is better than Lossl/Virginnia (who may move on loan again).
The criticism of this could be, that goalkeeper should have been a bigger priority earlier in the summer.
I'll play devils advocate here a bit though, why would you want to bring in competition for Pickford at the same level? You either want better than him, or you want a more effective number 2. I don't think anyone an make the case that Olsen, at this point is a credible better goalkeeper but there is lots of evidence to state he will be a stronger number 2 than Lossl.
I'll be honest, I never really understood the Lossl signing. He was poor and ultimately dropped for the 20th placed team in the country. He was average in the championship too.
Just replying to both to save clogging up the thread.Maybe mate, but we shipped him off on loan in January with no other option either!
Yeah, like you, I'm pretty unsure on it. Romero would have been my choice but not on the deal United wanted. Not for a 33-year-old stop-gap who primarily is coming in as competition.
We'll see I suppose. The pressure is at least on in some regard for Pickford to improve. Think they've had enough of him and I think he knew the other day that he has nowhere to hide now.
Just replying to both to save clogging up the thread.
We had Stekelenburg last year, and Virginia had come back from loan, and we also had nothing at all to play for by January, so loaning out Lossl was the sensible thing to do really.
Personally I just don't really go in for the 'better competition' line. I don't think there have been many instances where clubs genuinely have 2 keepers fighting it out for the shirt, generally there is an established number 1 and someone who will come in and do a job if needed. I've said before, United are the only club I can think of in the last couple of years where you could argue their number 2 could be number 1, and it has coincided with the worst period of form in De Gea's career. Liverpool have the best keeper in the league and their back up is a clown. I just don't really see any merit in the argument to be honest.
Maybe despite what I thought the money was not there or at least allowed to be spent .
Maybe Donnarumma is the long term plan
Some journalist is not proof. He doesn't even have a blue tick!
Man Utd wanted a transfer for Romero, if we were interested it sounds like we wanted a loan (which makes sense as we will be getting our next full time keeper in the summer)
Pickford doesn't need competition, he just needs to stop being crap. He is not being crap due to lack of competition.
There is no way on earth that Lossl is on 50k a week!
For us to have got Romero (who isn't even that good) we would have needed to buy him, then come summer we would be stuck with another goalkeeper who we would need to shift on on a long deal and high wages.
Maybe.
Think it's telling Everton went for Romero and Gazzaniga, before this fella at the death though.
Let's see - I pretty confident Pickford remains number one. I'd be surprised if Olsen makes a single premier league appearance.
There is no proof that we went for either of those players.
I do think we are looking to get by for this season in goal so that we can attack the role properly next summer.
Anyone got any vids of him?
Maybe. At some level though, you can see more thought could have been put into it. Fulham loaned Aerola. There were options.