paulbefc
Player Valuation: £60m
He gets the service, that's why he's scored that many goals. It doesn't work in a bubble - if the ball doesn't go to him, he can't score a goal, so for goalscoring purposes he obviously gets the service.
What he doesn't do is get involved in general play and link up with other attacking players to bring them into the final third, so the overall team is more effective attacking. You are mistaking service with offensive cohesion as a team. How is a full back supposed to get up the pitch to crossing areas if the striker is not arsed in the slightest in holding play up and giving them time to do it? Why should they gamble and make that run when ol' ping pong shins is probably going to give it away in 2 seconds flat and leave you massive out of position for the counter?
So what happens instead is that we break down in offensive areas over and over again because we've got an attacking focal point who can't get the team up the pitch reliably.
That's why Lukaku is a goalscoring asset, yet a footballing liability. I firmly believe that if we can mug a club of £80m+ and improve the squad, we can start building a team that plays like a top club does, because Lukaku does not allow you, as a team, to play possession, quality football that the really good sides do.
This is all built on giving far too high a weighting to his contribution to our attacking play in terms of importance and an overstatement of the effect his weaknesses have had on it.
It's not a strength of his game, but the supporting forwards (Bolasie, Barkley, Lennon, Deulofeu, Valencia, Mirallas) have all, apart from Mirallas (who's inconsistent at the best of times) had average to terrible seasons, either due to under-performance or injury. While Lukaku has been excelling in (by a country mile) the most important part of his job and winning the golden boot while racking up a good number of assists, they have been performing staggeringly badly generally, considering the quality of finisher they're supplying.
The idea that these players are constantly getting the ball forward to Lukaku in promising positions and then he's losing it constantly is absolutely separate from reality. He didn't have his best game at the weekend and yet the number of times he got his hold-up play spot on greatly outnumbered the instances in which his touch/pass let him down. In fact, the vast majority of the time, our supporting forwards can't even get to the point of having the chance to give him the ball and Lukaku is left up against 2/3 centre backs with little to no movement either side of him to occupy defenders and no space to run into. If the rest of the team can't handle a man-marked player losing possession a handful of times in 90 minutes, they're probably utter toilet.
What's great is at the weekend he ended up creating our two best chances of the match, whipping in two great crosses, both showing up his "suppliers" and demonstrating that he isn't a "footballing liability". Our moves don't break down because Lukaku's first touch isn't great the majority of the time and I think you know that. They break down because although we don't like to say it, our "creative" players aren't actually very good.