As said mate, these stats are all malleable depending on what site you use and the exact metric being taken from them (long ball/pass etc). HOWEVER, even by your own chosen criteria your point is destroyed when you consider that this season we have the third highest rate of long ball use - and God knows what it must have been say a month or two ago before we began to get it down and play a bit.
Martinez's teams seem to fluctuate between a mid point to upper levels....which pretty much underlines what BS stats can come up with, because our own generally accepted knowledge of that era was that we played a lot of short balls and didn't get back to front as quickly as we should a lot of the time.
How is my point destroyed mate, you are stating repeatedly that Koemans style of football is the hoof and run style - long ball merchants etc. You have also stated that the recent period that we are playing it on the deck cannot be taken as a sign that is the way he wants to play, and basically harp on about that he has always been someone who plays the long ball etc
The stats i showed from last season - when Koeman had the time to bed in his players, and his system - show catagorically over the course of 38 games that a Martinez team decided to go long far more often than Koemans Southampton team did - how is that malleable - or subjective in the slightest - hell i even used the site you put up to argue your own point to show those figures mate? - as for the exaxct metric - it's the same used for every team mate, they don't use different yardsticks for each...
As for Martinez occupying mid to upper table on the number of long balls played (4th on the most played in his final season) and it showing how the stat is worthless - errrm no Dave it doesn't - what it does show is we ran out of ideas frequently - passing it round and round and back and then a lump up front aimlessly half the time, or putting ourselves under so much presure fannying around that we ended up getting forced into almost making a clearance whilst in possession.
How often for example did we get a free kick in a decent position and end up going back and sideways with it - until it ended up with a cb or keeper who then lumped it up front?
So basically your point is that Koeman is a long ball merchant and thats how he wants us to play
Despite evidence which shows at Southampton he didn't - and was in fact playing a lot less of them than some supposdely 'beautiful' footballing sides?
Despite the evidence that he has as the team begins to adapt to his systems - we have been playing less and less of them and more and more on the ground - much like he did at Saints?
But you would rather take in isolation his initial period at us, with quite a lot of players he didnt rate - with a woefully unfit team unable to press the way he wanted and with confidence shot on half the squad when he took over - and thats your barometre to judge how he wants to play?
So Dave - what exactly are you basing your entire opinion of Koeman being a long ball style manager on - it can't be the stats - as youve been shown that in his career he doesnt favour that, i am assuming that it's not with your own eyes, as i seriously doubt you have ever watched a southampton game that wasnt against us, ditto i dont believe you would have ever watched any of his previous clubs when he was manager, so do tell, exactly why is Koeman a long ball manager?
There is having a viewpoint mate, and there is taking absolutely everything you can do in isolation to fit that view, ignoring everything that contradicts that view or debunks it, or making more and more ridiculous excuses why something can be ignored that doesn't fit into your set in stone portrait of the manager.
The Park end made him play the kids being a somewhat classic of yours