He sounds like he backtracks on his post game analysis...tones the criticism down on the team by saying it wasn't so much B'mouth's greater aggression, more that they left too much distance between the lines when pressing.Dave?
He sounds like he backtracks on his post game analysis...tones the criticism down on the team by saying it wasn't so much B'mouth's greater aggression, more that they left too much distance between the lines when pressing.
Maybe he's had a word in his ear from the current dressing room shop steward.
He does, after reviewing the game as a whole he came up with the answer.
Ronny doesnt listen to plotters.
But ok...
He sounds like he backtracks on his post game analysis...tones the criticism down on the team by saying it wasn't so much B'mouth's greater aggression, more that they left too much distance between the lines when pressing.
Maybe he's had a word in his ear from the current dressing room shop steward.
If he isn't then he views him as a player that he intends to use. By the same token, I would have thought that he was pleased he was getting game time during the break.Just watched it there, doesnt seem happy with McCarthys Irish call up at all.
Only just seen that. Such a refreshing change from the last chap
He has previous here. IIRC he was scathing about Long's use by the RoI when he was getting back from injury.If he isn't then he views him as a player that he intends to use. By the same token, I would have thought that he was pleased he was getting game time during the break.
It reads to me like this:Initial criticism is fine. But if criticism is extended it serves no constructive purpose in management.
You don't lambast a player when you want a performance. You only lambast them when they're doing something wrong.
Later you give constructive feedback before what is an entirely different game.
I see nothing unusual here Dave.