Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Ross Barkley

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's clear what Damon is saying lids:

Playing Barkley for 10 games and having him injured for 2 would be awful, so it's better to play him in none at all than risk him missing some.
 
Its a post by Alan Ball saying Barkley turned his ankle in a practice match in July. How is that unrelated?

I could go one further and give you a link of Wilshere's latest scan and expectation of being back in Feburary 2012 (out since August).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16217132.stm

Wenger himself was unhappy he was playing with England (over played). England were unhappy that Arsenal were over playing him.


But hey why let the facts get in the way of some excellent fuming?

So now we are using unrelated injuries to fuel the argument.

Hmm, maybe I can apply that logic to my own life.

Well, I am going to skip work today, because it is raining over the Atlantic.

Damn, no. It makes no sense. It is illogical.

Come on Matt!!! Barkley turning his ankle over was the first time a player has been injured. In the history of the world.
 
So now we are using unrelated injuries to fuel the argument.

Hmm, maybe I can apply that logic to my own life.

Well, I am going to skip work today, because it is raining over the Atlantic.

Damn, no. It makes no sense. It is illogical.

Come on Matt!!! Barkley turning his ankle over was the first time a player has been injured. In the history of the world.

Yes but that was directly contradictory to the Tubey assertion that he'd been entirely free of injury.

And there are plenty of quotes from Wenger worrying about Wilshere being overplayed and low and behold he gets a 6 month injury and then he blames England!

Its like people don't want to acknowledge what doesn't suit them. Just like Wenger.



There's more holes in these fumers arguments than swiss cheese.

Most of them would ruin a young player like Barkley.

But keep fuming lids. Its giving me something to laugh at.
 
Give me Barkley over Neville in midfield any day of the week.

I think the point that some are trying to make is that Barkley never gets a look in - McFadden seem to get the nod ahead of him - find this baffling. If your good enough which his is -play him.

The lad is class and we should be seeing more of him before one of the Sky 4 take him off our hands.
 

One thing you can say about our team is they work hard all over the pitch (maybe Louis aside) and if we had the luxury of being able to carry a couple of players not as disciplined as the rest, then I am sure Ross would be in there. DM picks players who fit in with the team ethic and HIS gameplan, and thinks that Ross can't match this criteria at the moment.

Look at Royston, he has improved his defensive contribution in his last couple of games. RB's time will come (the sooner the better) and as soon as he is ready I'm sure Moyes will use him....I can't wait.


Your own post suggests that he prefers defending more than attack as you point out that a flair player in Drenthe is having to defend. So when he says that his team can't score, it's mainly cos the players are trying to follow the stupid defending tactics that they have forgotten what attack looks like.

Answer me this, does defending a corner with 11 men against a mid table team guarantee that you wouldn't concead a goal? Why not have one man on the half way line so that the opposition is aware that they are susceptible to a counter?

Why defending come first is the main issue and it's boring and pathetic to watch. Also, how will your strikers score when there's no one to provide service in midfield cos it's filled with Heitinga and Neville and then he plays Rodwell on wings everynow and then. Why can't he take a gamble and try to fit billy in the center cos I think the lad has a pass in him and he can score as well from there. Why is Billy only a player who's only allowed to prove himself on Left Wing?

David Moyes can hide behind the money issue all he want but he has failed to bring the most of his players for a long long time now. I really don't see any improvement in Coleman's game and that's evident when he under performs. Coleman has been a part of this team for 2 years so why can't he phase into RB or is it gonna happen when Hibbert retires at 35 and Coleman turns 28 himself?

How bad could it be to surprise the opposition by unleashing Barkley for 5 to 10 min when he can't do more wrong than what cahill and saha are doing?
 
Yes but that was directly contradictory to the Tubey assertion that he'd been entirely free of injury.

And there are plenty of quotes from Wenger worrying about Wilshere being overplayed and low and behold he gets a 6 month injury and then he blames England!

Its like people don't want to acknowledge what doesn't suit them. Just like Wenger.



There's more holes in these fumers arguments than swiss cheese.

Most of them would ruin a young player like Barkley.

But keep fuming lids. Its giving me something to laugh at.

It's obvious what I was saying - he's had no reoccurence of any issues arising from a double leg break, like arthritis, another snap, things of a career ending nature.

I thought that so obvious I didn't think it'd need mentioning FFS. Unbelievable.
 
Yes but that was directly contradictory to the Tubey assertion that he'd been entirely free of injury.

So you are just being an petty little ass then
And there are plenty of quotes from Wenger worrying about Wilshere being overplayed and low and behold he gets a 6 month injury and then he blames England!

Yep, because those hundreds of games for England tipped him over the edge.

Its like people don't want to acknowledge what doesn't suit them. Just like Wenger.



There's more holes in these fumers arguments than swiss cheese.

Most of them would ruin a young player like Barkley.

But keep fuming lids. Its giving me something to laugh at.

Lets just sell him so WE don't ruin him then.

Me, I want to see Barkley flourish. The only way we are going to do that is for him to play.
 
It's obvious what I was saying - he's had no reoccurence of any issues arising from a double leg break, like arthritis, another snap, things of a career ending nature.

I thought that so obvious I didn't think it'd need mentioning FFS. Unbelievable.

Yes it was obvious what your were saying - was completely WRONG. And that he had been injured since.

WRONG.

WRONG.

WRONG.

KENWRONG.
 
Its a post by Alan Ball saying Barkley turned his ankle in a practice match in July. How is that unrelated?

I could go one further and give you a link of Wilshere's latest scan and expectation of being back in Feburary 2012 (out since August).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16217132.stm

Wenger himself was unhappy he was playing with England (over played). England were unhappy that Arsenal were over playing him.


But hey why let the facts get in the way of some excellent fuming?

Instead of going one further, you can do one further up your arse, but it's too bad your head is so far deep inside it anyway.

Who says that even if the worst incident like that happens it turns out to be the same in every situation? Wilshere broke his leg, he's not doing very well with it now - okay, I understand. Mismanagement or just complications - I don't really care, sorry.

Valencia, on the other hand, also broke his leg, didn't he? And he's playing now, quite fine, isn't he? And he's playing week in, week out, too. Go figure, right?

I fully expect you to divert again, from this imo valid point, by saying "but it's not a double leg break" or some other nonsense like that.
 

HOLD THE PHONE!!!

This isn't about Barkley for Damon! He couldn't care less about RB.

This is about defending Moyes and his decisions!!!!

Well played Matt, hiding the true objective for so long!
 
HOLD THE PHONE!!!

This isn't about Barkley for Damon! He couldn't care less about RB.

This is about defending Moyes and his decisions!!!!

Well played Matt, hiding the true objective for so long!

1. Yes he will play a full season; if he escapes injury

2."I think under the guidance of David Moyes, Ross Barkley will develop into a superstar who will play a full season for Everton...." - I stand by that and you can add that to the vaults.

3. No. I'm only interested in Everton. Meaning Barkley, Everton and anyone else we bring through which is more likely if our club does the above see point 2.

4. Rubbish statement re: Moyes ruining Barkley.

Have you been on those party-poppers again D/D ?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Back
Top