He needs to go straight back into the squad as soon as he's fit, he's the best scapegoat I've ever seen in the Everton shirt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
So you must believe that siggy is better than ross? Seeing as stats say so
I like his long tail and his ability to gnaw on all objects
How can I prove that he pretends to press? Don't think there is a stat for standing in front of a player and not putting a tackle in or attempting to with the ball
I watch footie with my eyes not stats Tello, and erm, well Ross>Sigurdsson.
Simon baker
Player Valuation: £10m
They don't if you delve into them.
I'd seriously suggest you broaden your horizons & listen or read up on some of the stats data out there for example matt cheetham who works for sky sports as a Stats analysis & also has a season ticket for Everton.
He was devastated at the thought of replacing Barkley with siggurdson citing numerous stats largely based on open play. He did a fantastic segment on the blueroom podcast.
Chris smith a football writer also tweeted some very interesting stats before he signed such as we scored more from corners last season than Swansea plus is siggurdson that much Better at free kicks than baines, Rooney & Sandro who has a good record scoring direct from free kicks.
In summary mate open play siggurdson is pretty average he had less key passes than Gareth Barry last season. Ross destroys him in open play.
Bruised Ego.
the more you post the more you prove yourself wrong, and the more you expose your quite frankly bizarre agenda against a local lad, Ross kills siggy in open play, and the stats back that up
Same as me.. my eyes tell me ross doesn't work hard enough , and they also tell me siggy has been awful
tadao
Player Valuation: £25m
So we paid £45-50mill for an awful player and yet you still bang on about how poor Ross is at pressing?
I do th rate siggy either but Barkley fans constantly switch there argument. They say Barkley is better than siggy which is fair enough, then I say he's lazy, they then say that the stats prove otherwise and my eyes are wrong. So then I Mention that sights stats are better than Ross's so he must be better? This apparently translates into "tel hates ross" if you go by eyes then ross is lazy but stats say otherwise ...but they ignor the stats that say siggy is better and tell me I should use my eyes. The point I was trying to make is that I don't go on stats... I go on what I see, and from what I see Barkley was below the standard required and was not working hard enough
Just because siggy isn't good enough, that doesn't mean Barkley is. Does Williams playing badly mean jagielka suddenly becomes better? No it's doesn't both aren't good enough
the stats don't say siggy is better than Ross, our man @Timak did fine work debunking the myth of siggy being better than ross long before we have witnessed it, I've been 100 percent consistent, I don't think he is lazy, and I think he's a top player, and I don't believe the nonsense of how he is scared of the crowd, he has always asked for the ball, and that takes more bottle than flying into tackles and all that rubbish, which is just bravado.
tadao
Player Valuation: £25m
Completely, confused by whatever you said there.
Trim it down so I understand.
Maybe, just say "I hate Ross", that'll do really and sums up your stance on it.
Working hard and being part of a team is bravado? I'm not talking two footed challenges... I'm talking trying to win the ball back when he is stood writhin 3m of the player in possession
- Status