TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
I don't get why people think Sarri was bad for Chelsea. Tuchel is a fair bit different I think.Tuchel is Sarri all over again. Weird formations all over the shop.
They should have stuck with Frank.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't get why people think Sarri was bad for Chelsea. Tuchel is a fair bit different I think.Tuchel is Sarri all over again. Weird formations all over the shop.
They should have stuck with Frank.
He wasn't bad but he wasn't great either. He improved their points total from the year before by 2 points but they were still miles off of the top 2 of City and Chelsea.I don't get why people think Sarri was bad for Chelsea. Tuchel is a fair bit different I think.
Ah I got you, I know they weren't a ton better in the league but he won the Europa so to me he was successful. And Sarri is a bit different because he's very rigid in what he wants to do. Tuchel will chop and change. Which might be what they need right now because no one has any clue what their best system is.He wasn't bad but he wasn't great either. He improved their points total from the year before by 2 points but they were still miles off of the top 2 of City and Chelsea.
I wasn't saying he was bad just that he and Tuchel both love their weird formations and tactics.
Ah I got you, I know they weren't a ton better in the league but he won the Europa so to me he was successful. And Sarri is a bit different because he's very rigid in what he wants to do. Tuchel will chop and change. Which might be what they need right now because no one has any clue what their best system is.
That's my feeling too but it isn't that simple when you have Pulisic and Ziyech's hamstringsKovacic Kante Mount
Ziyech Giroud Pulisic
Sorted, gimme the job.
That's my feeling too but it isn't that simple when you have Pulisic and Ziyech's hamstrings
He was never going to go back to another championship season either though.It's farcical all how so many are saying he couldn't turn it down when it was offered, of course he could have. Chelsea change managers every 18-24 months anyway, he should have carried on with Derby and gained more crucial experience. If he did well then Roman would certainly have called back.
He took it out of ego and the media are defending him out of nothing but bias for English managers. It was a ridiculous move for a novice to make.
Why sack him after a win though?
What has beating Luton done to get him sacked?
agree.From Lampard? No he isn’t.
But their cycle under Abramovich of fairly short-term appointments around the 2 year mark is fairly successful overall and (I think) is the most decorated era in the clubs history.Every serious managerial prospect must look at the Chelsea job and think, "I'll be lucky to get two years." Then, subconsciously, will eyes be on a pay check?
There is no long-term plan at Chelsea or at least no real methodology in terms of how they'll achieve it.