Nor am I, but people are going way OTT with that debate.I too would go with pragmatism every time to get the win. Especially with the team we have at the moment. I don't have any issue with that at all.
I don't see us playing fancy stuff once we are "safe", but keeping on going in the most effective manner possible for points accumulation under BS. It's the only thing he has going for him to keep the job. It would be nice to think that somewhere over the horizon, a decent footballing side is being assembled - maybe it will, maybe it won't, I guess that'll be what keeps him on beyond his current contract if that is even a possibility.
Only 3 games in mind against 2 bad teams and a jammy draw, so I shouldn't be getting too far ahead of myself.
Asked before, but gonna try again - hypothetically, if we were to appoint Simeone and not Sam when we did, would people be fawning all over our "amazing direct play" and crap like that, provided both play the same/similar types of football and had gotten the same results? Do you* expect Simeone was gonna go all out dominating against teams? Hell naw, he was gonna do the same - tight at the back, fast going forward. Problem is our players aren't very good at that (or very limited, to say the least, right now), so it's not pretty at all.
My bet is "defo yes", cuz he's foreign and that. If he was Douglas Simon he'd be labelled as Fat Sam mk. II in England ffs!