> Footballers don't give a toss about the new ground. They would play on Stanley Park for a few more quid a week.
Take the point on cash. Though when two clubs offering the same/similar cash come along, those other items absolutely become a factor, and if a player was being advised correctly, he'd be told to avoid the manager with the track record of negative anti-football and favouring older 30+ players.
> The training facilities are on par with most other top flight clubs these days.
Agreed, that's what I said, for us to have facilities that rival the top clubs in the country is a selling point.
> The league has 19 other clubs in it. The owners have proved nothing yet (obviously!)
What we can prove is that they have invested in the first place, and what they have said since - we can imply from that, their intent. Which if true, would presumably leave us above many of those 19 clubs (outwith maybe 8 of them?)
Your man Dyche is doing far more damage than his negative playing style, anti-football and fairly embarrassing levels of gaslighting about performance on the park.
He is damaging the clubs reputation and our ability to attract the types of players we will need to start rebuilding for the future. Its only once he is gone that the club will begin the rebuild and begin working towards the future, the sooner he is gone the better.
Though I do agree, he will be given the next 6 months, depressingly.