You look at other teams who change managers and get a massive improvement, like at Villa with [Poor language removed] in charge. Then people say "well, this proves it's not the players, a good manager can make a big difference". But it's easy to improve on players that were underperforming, it's not so easy when the players are just rubbish. Villa had underperformers, we're just rubbish. Thanks Mosh.
It's why Leicester will stay up.
It had gone toxic there, a new voice/novelty of that change will see them kick on. Just like Palace.
Ultimately though, the team who create the least, and score the least, are always going to be bang in trouble.