Well, he made 5 changes I believe Vs Villa for what was a cup game.
Generally whenever Gana is fit, he starts and I think it's a mistake - compounded when it's alongside Onana. How many times have we had Onana play the number 6 without Gana next to him?
I like Gana but it's either him or Onana IMO. The view Dyche has that Gana and Onana can contribute in the final third isn't ideal.
When you think back one of the first things he did, was bring three into midfield as opposed to what Lampard was doing, Doucoure came in less as a ten and more of an 8 and half, he drops fairly deep to make a three. We were getting over run most games playing Iwobi as a 10.
It was the first thing he changed, it worked and we had a solid base not to get stuffed and the midfield battered.
As you say - maybe it is time to change that. The decision for me is less about Garner and more as Idrissa Vs Onana. Onana was brilliant yesterday, he has that. But he can also not influence a game and go out of it, drift or let him pass it by - maybe it changes if hes given that role - but its a judgement call - maybe the time is now - i think he earned the opportunity yesterday. I agree its one or the other, particularly against the teams you mention.
One thing id say is i think we play fairly open regardless of how many 6's or which 6's we have, our centre backs can easily be got at and we cough up chances. Dont think either have been steller defensively in general play and both arent great defending at set piece's.
Another angle is mind, yesterday was the first time we had Harrsion and McNeill available to start on the flanks, so we didnt need Garner out there as a utility so that creates the dilemma in the centre and competition between the three. Thats the first time we've had that to be fair. Its really good to now have that choice in the squad and competition.
Idrissa hasnt been the same player since hes come back for me, i think hes lost a bit, hes had good patches, but also some terrible ones. Hes a good solid pro mind.
Last edited: