The debate about style of play is nothing new. It's never going to go away.
I would also argue that football belongs to the entertainment industry, but what is entertaining to watch is subjective.
Many hold up Manchester City, Arsenal, etc, as the gold standard, but 80 percent of their games during the season just consist of passing the ball backwards and sideways, without taking any big risks at all. It kills the joy of football.
There are two types of offensive styles: (a) teams that mainly prioritize passing to the feet, and in this style, as a rule, the players have predetermined spaces that they will occupy. Which means greater distances between the players overall, but also less creative freedom. The tempo of the game here is also generally lower. (b) Teams that prioritize passing to space, and here one occupies space dynamically. This usually means shorter distances between the players, and greater creative freedom. The pace of the game here is generally higher.
Personally, I am more entertained by teams that prioritize (b) to a greater extent than (a). I would say that under Dyche we belong more to category (b) than (a). But we undoubtedly have a lot to improve here, and we will probably never be Brazil 1982.
Having said that, we have a style of play, and the problem for many is that this style is not category (a). This is the style that is dominant in today's football, and which is judged as the benchmark for good football or not.