Morning Steven,So Dyche and the club lie about injuries in order to save face for Dyche, and the players also stay silent on this?
The conspiracies continue to grow
You have a lot to learn when you join the real world.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Morning Steven,So Dyche and the club lie about injuries in order to save face for Dyche, and the players also stay silent on this?
The conspiracies continue to grow
Can't really be saying this as people who live on an Internet forumMorning Steven,
You have a lot to learn when you join the real world.
Because of NDiaye and Lindstrom? Two players who arrived on the back of disaster seasons, who hadn't played in the top flight. They were going to resolve our chronic lack of goals?
Its mad that all the players Dyche doesn't like always seem to get injuries and are kept away from the squad
Yet those who he loves seem to recover from injuries a lot sooner and are straight back in the squad.
Every man and his dog knew Dyche didn't want Onana, but yeah ok
It properly does my nut in that people don't realise this - we replaced a £50m defensive midfielder with a kid from the Championship who can't tackle, we signed a 3rd choice CB with minimal down payment, we started this season with our £60m defender injured, the only two attackers of note that we added were coming off of horror seasons with no Prem experience... and yet the expectation seemed to be that we would have some grand send off year for Goodison?
Dyche did a good job last year - unfortunately I fear that this has made a bit of a rod for his own back.
It’s just daft this. He was a regular starter for us, he lost his place for a few games after a 6-0 defeat but then came back in. We don’t have to claim he was the first name on the team sheet but this constant suggestion that dyche didn’t use him is just demonstrably false. There’s loads of stuff to have a go at dyche for, but stuff like this is just stupid - it’s like a point blank refusal to accept any mitigation at all for anything and so totally weakens the argument rather than strengthens it.
Let me check.Can't really be saying this as people who live on an Internet forum
Its tinpot when there's actual evidence to support it. Shall we talk about Abdoulaye Doucoure.You’ve finally gone full tin hat crackpot
Ohara and Cindy are clowns.
Of course they are right dyche has not got us playing football that is pleasing on the eye. But it’s very much a temporary measure.
It’s percentage football, it will scrape us to safety. He will then move on, new owners will come in and a new chapter will begin. And hopefully a plot change
I think most do realise it, but it's this;
It’s just daft this. He was a regular starter for us, he lost his place for a few games after a 6-0 defeat but then came back in. We don’t have to claim he was the first name on the team sheet but this constant suggestion that dyche didn’t use him is just demonstrably false. There’s loads of stuff to have a go at dyche for, but stuff like this is just stupid - it’s like a point blank refusal to accept any mitigation at all for anything and so totally weakens the argument rather than strengthens it.
Its tinpot when there's actual evidence to support it. Shall we talk about Abdoulaye Doucoure.
Taken off at Burnley at half time due to injury, Dyche telling the media that he hope he acted quick enough in getting him.
Ruled out until 30th December 23
Plays 90 minutes against Wolves 2 days later, on New Years Day
In doing so is then injured and misses the next 4 games, almost 2 months
But yeah, i'm sure there's a reason for that. No "back on the grass", "needs assessing".