1.2 litre is rapid these days.Can I vote for those with a license of less than 3 years to only be able to drive 1.2litre engines?
So if you want to keep them out of "faster" cars, you would need to lower it under 1.0 at least.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1.2 litre is rapid these days.Can I vote for those with a license of less than 3 years to only be able to drive 1.2litre engines?
It's not very mature is it.Eating cheese while driving is a bit wreckless and should be banned.
grate that.It's not very mature is it.
Making cheese puns in a serious thread about road safety. How dairy!grate that.
?You what?
I'd also change the rules about speed-limited vehicles. They should NOT be allowed to overtake each other because they immediately cause congestion and bunching. 6 points, £1000 fine to the driver and £10,000 fine to the company employing them.
Also remove the restriction on overtaking using the left lane. If some plank is sitting in the middle lane doing 55 and the person to his right occupies the outermost lane doing 60, there is no sense in preventing me passing them both at 70 on the left provided there is room to do so.
Half the people on UK roads genuinely worry me with what appears to be vastly inattentive tunnel-vision driving.
Speeding should be allowed as long as you're listening to a bit of R&BrieMaking cheese puns in a serious thread about road safety. How dairy!
I wasn't comparing the accidents number, but the accident per km which leads to very tiny numbers and a tiny increase
Yes, but it’s only a tiny number if there’s only a billion miles travelled, as it’s PER billion.I think it is because its 7 more every billion miles/KM. Which while that is 70% more, its still "just" 7. One bad minibus crash could be the actual difference. And a billion miles is an awful lot of miles.
Like I say, I think.
Good shout. Feta safe than sorrySpeeding should be allowed as long as you're listening to a bit of R&Brie
I don't know what motorways you tend to use, but in my area of the south it is a regular daily occurrence to see two out of three lanes on the M23 occupied by two articulated lorries side by side. As @Baines' left foot will confirm, when you get onto the M25 it's commonplace to see lorries driving three abreast, in three lanes out of four. There's a stretch of the M4, eastbound near Bath iirc, where you will often see lorries in lanes 1 and 2 trying to overtake each other whilst going uphill - utterly ridiculous.If a speed limited vehicle is going very slowly for whatever reason do you not think it's reasonable to allow another speed limited vehicle to overtake it? The manoeuvre can take a little longer but it can often be completed safely within a reasonable time frame. And there are often 3 or even 4 lanes - speed limited vehicles rarely require more than one of those lanes. There are some exceptions but I doubt you'll often see those performing overtakes.
It's not the overtake itself that causes bunching but capacity. If people could get over their tunnel-vision and realise that sometimes part of sharing the road is slowing down a little and thinking about traffic flow and allowing space rather than their own personal journey time then the bunching wouldn't be as bad.
As worrying as tunnel vision driving is it's the absolute piss boiling that occurs from some drivers over the slightest delay and entitlement that is more worrying.
They're all frustrating examples but they are examples of poor overtaking method, selfishness and stretched capacity rather than where different road laws would bring a solution that brings free flowing traffic. Put all the speed restricted vehicles in lane 1 and you're going to have a load of slightly faster but ultimately slow drivers in lane 2. Then you're shifting the middle lane hogs over to 3 and so forth.I don't know what motorways you tend to use, but in my area of the south it is a regular daily occurrence to see two out of three lanes on the M23 occupied by two articulated lorries side by side. As @Baines' left foot will confirm, when you get onto the M25 it's commonplace to see lorries driving three abreast, in three lanes out of four. There's a stretch of the M4, eastbound near Bath iirc, where you will often see lorries in lanes 1 and 2 trying to overtake each other whilst going uphill - utterly ridiculous.
Should a speed restricted vehicle be allowed to pass another speed restricted vehicle? No. Not unless one of them is stationary due to having broken down. The only compromise I'd make in that regard is that I would grudgingly accept speed-restricted vehicles in lanes 1 and 2 on any 4-lane motorway. On a three-lane motorway though, they should all stay in lane 1. Maybe a compromise could be to relax that rule after 7pm, until 6am the next day.
There is nothing reasonable about a vehicle travelling at 56mph (unable to go any faster) deciding to move out a lane in order to overtake another vehicle travelling at 52mph and taking five minutes to complete the manoeuvre. To borrow a phrase from yourself, it's part of sharing the road: don't deliberately inconvenience others.
They used to do that in Italy and Germany I thinkCan I vote for those with a license of less than 3 years to only be able to drive 1.2litre engines?