Would only cost about 4m as well. Surely we have that in reserve even with a big summer spend planned?
Hes a risk injury wise tho mate.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would only cost about 4m as well. Surely we have that in reserve even with a big summer spend planned?
I think we have to take the plunge at a still 22 year old Spanish prodigy for 4m.Hes a risk injury wise tho mate.
I think we have to take the plunge at a still 22 year old Spanish prodigy for 4m.
I'd rather we bought more than one non-injured player. But I'm not in charge. As you know.Would rather we signed a non injured player for once really mate.
Think Canales would be a very astute buy.
Would only cost about 4m as well. Surely we have that in reserve even with a big summer spend planned?
Valencia spent £6.2 buying him from Real Madrid, so it would be a decent buy. Better option than Osman and he's still only 22.
We desperately need a lock picker, in a passing sense, in the side. We look remarkably toothless without Barkley on the pitch.Me too (if we are actually in for him)
Has the hallmarks of what we did with arteta. Highly rated player who has lost confidence and stalled, but with huge natural potential and ability if under the right guidance...
My cat is a better option than Osman.
Hi Leon.
Me too (if we are actually in for him)
Has the hallmarks of what we did with arteta. Highly rated player who has lost confidence and stalled, but with huge natural potential and ability if under the right guidance...
Think Canales is *potentially* a better player than Mikel was. I stress potentially like.that's not a bad comparison really. cheers mate.
We aren't using Gueye, so that's a bit of a non-sequitur.
Please don't compare our squad's strength to Chelsea's. Please.
The point is that our squad was already thinner than both Chelsea's and Spurs', and it's been further tested with all of these injuries.
I don't expect them to go out and spend 30 million in January, that's foolish. But there are gaping holes in this squad (attacking midfielder, center midfield, fullbacks) that need to be addressed.
Think Canales is *potentially* a better player than Mikel was. I stress potentially like.
I did say potentially. The lad could be very very good in a side that is screaming out for his sort of player like we are.My god, my utter god..............
Mikel was AMAZING, this Sergio can only hope to half as talented.
Ho can you care Chelsea squad strength with Everton's?