Ashtonian
Banned on request
I agree mate, and to be honest i'm probably part of the mirallas brigade lolThe problem I have with the criticism of players like Naismith is that some of our fans are hypocritical. They are quite happy to justify ineffective games that Mirallas has because he shows flashes of brilliance, but when Naismith contributes little, they slaughter him for not being a brilliant player.
The reason Martinez picks players like Naismith, who at the end of the day is primarily a grafter who can weigh in with some important goals, is because while he's having a bad game, he's still putting the effort in and most likely providing some defensive cover or getting in the oppositions face. He's got the right attitude which managers love. That's why players like Milner have had such effective careers in this league.
Players like Mirallas for example, have talent in abundance, but when they're having a bad game, they go missing or sulk and contribute nothing.
The challenge Martinez faces with having more options now, is keeping all of those players happy like Deulofeu, Lennon, Mirallas and Naismith because they can all contribute in different ways.
I just feel, when we play naismith we aren't doing so for any reason other than to hope he does something, hope he scores, hope he runs around enough. I can't see the player there, whereas take kone for example, you can see what exactly he does. Going back the chelsea game, ok naismith scores the hat trick and gets all the plaudits, rightly so. Kone was immense all over the pitch for us on the right. And he is a terrible midfielder, but his 'role' that game was getting his head on every set piece which he did, that was his team role. Naismith doesn't seem to have that role n my perspective, he just plays, and if he does well then its well done manager, if he doesn't then he is a wasted postion for the 70+ minutes he is on (cant pass, cant tackle).