Can't agree at all I'm afraid. Bolasie has been consistently picked as a first team player whilst Vlasic hasn't. Bolasie has actually made a contribution and changed games as recently as this last season, whilst Vlasic has done nothing but run around a bit.
We will get a higher fee and more interest in Bolasie than we will Vlasic, and that's because he's the better player, who has shown far more than Vlasic has.
Bolasie has been constantly picked as a first teamer (rightly so) by Koeman when he was first signed.
Since then the only person who picked him as a first teamer was Allardyce. A man who in six months at this club took it a further two years back.
Surely there's better points to back up your argument than that?
Also, I agree that Bolasie is - on paper - currently a better player. You'd expect that. But I'd rather see him go than Vlasic.
However, if he stays I'll be fully behind him. I was one of Bolasie's biggest advocates on here initially, but he just looks shot to me.