canuckblue
Player Valuation: £50m
People on here are clueless yes we have spent a lot but that's because we've been able too thanks to player sales! We've spent less than what we have made.
Says the leader of the parade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
People on here are clueless yes we have spent a lot but that's because we've been able too thanks to player sales! We've spent less than what we have made.
-7m actually
He didn't state that though. He said spent. Big difference.net spend
You said spent not net spent. Net spend is a pointless argument when there is a 75m fee involved.They've spent 40m we are minus 7
-7m actually
You said spent not net spent. Net spend is a pointless argument when there is a 75m fee involved.
Not really a statement of intent just spending money made from player sales
I thought moshiri was going to spend big?
What does negative net spend matter if we've improved the team.
Since you're so arsed about a positive net spend, I'm guessing you're going to be happy that we spend £45m on Gylfi, yep?
It seems it gives them a chance to knock the club they love for no apparent reason.Man United had a £120m net spend last season whilst finishing 6th and their only good player coming in on a free.
Why are people hung up on netspend? I'd rather us improve and not go bankrupt thanks.
We have spent big? We've broke our record twice over and are set to do it again.
The fact that we could possibly spend £200m outright, quite easily, this summer, and still break even by getting rid of players who don't want to be here or are just plain crap, shows the job that was required in the first place...
Because it's arguable whether we've improved the attack at all IMO, even if we do sign Sigurdsson. Nothing to do with net spend, it's about whether we've adequately replaced Lukaku.
Defensive signings are promising and Klaassen looks a good buy, so the overall squad is better (especially given promising youth players a year further on), as are areas of the first team but the attack isn't convincing me at this stage.
Because it's arguable whether we've improved the attack at all IMO, even if we do sign Sigurdsson. Nothing to do with net spend, it's about whether we've adequately replaced Lukaku.
Defensive signings are promising and Klaassen looks a good buy, so the overall squad is better (especially given promising youth players a year further on), as are areas of the first team but the attack isn't convincing me at this stage.
it's best we agree to disagree
I did say from the start Lukaku would be sold to cover the big spends we made in June. True
I also said we wont spend much more if any than what we bring in through player sales. I stand by that