S
sorryI think you missed the sarcasm in my reply mate. I was asked about a player called embargo!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sorryI think you missed the sarcasm in my reply mate. I was asked about a player called embargo!
What about Tielemans then? Would he of been a squad player for us? He bossed games in Beglium and he's doing that at Monaco now!....
What about Tielemans then? Would he of been a squad player for us? He bossed games in Beglium and he's doing that at Monaco now!....
In a nutshell cos it's too hot to type War nd Peace.
1. Abject performance yesterday.
2. Sold 25 goal striker did not replace.
3. No focal point for attacking intent
4. Aging defence.
5. Squad lacks true depth
6. We should look to overturn "big" teams as "smaller" teams shown it's possible already. We just rolled over. See points 1 and 2 again.
Big nutshell.
Bossed it from the bench v Marseille too btw !
Ligue 1 is not Prem standard but I'll give you that he is probably playing well.
Agree.
Davies would be an ideal signing.
Centre forward is going to be a struggle at this late stage. Of the 5 who regularly get mentioned on here
Giroud
Benteke
Vardy
Deeney
Costa
Giroud seems to be the popular choice, but has said he happy to get splinters all season on Arse's bench.
Costa is just a smoke screen for the club to say " we tried, but a deal cudn't be reached"
That leaves Benteke, Deeney and Vardy
Of those, i'd take Vardy, better work rate than Benteke, more goals than Deeney.
Ben Davies and Jamie Vardy for me.
1. Agreed. I put this down to the way we set up and managers tactics. Just think he's being overly cautious in these hard away games.In a nutshell cos it's too hot to type War nd Peace.
1. Abject performance yesterday.
2. Sold 25 goal striker did not replace.
3. No focal point for attacking intent
4. Aging defence.
5. Squad lacks true depth
6. We should look to overturn "big" teams as "smaller" teams shown it's possible already. We just rolled over. See points 1 and 2 again.
Big nutshell.
Any links to this?
The words "Benteke" and "Everton" are appearing in the same sentence from a usually reliable ITK on our forum this morning.
Mind you so are "sack" "the" "useless" "Dutch" " and "pillock".
He didn't look bothered (Benteke) on Saturday but on that basis you could end up with 8 or 9 of them.
I'm not trying to start a rumour, only posting what I've seen elsewhere; another rumour.
1. Agreed. I put this down to the way we set up and managers tactics. Just think he's being overly cautious in these hard away games.
2. Agreed but at least we know we're in for a another striker. Going to be harder the closer we get to the deadline but we'll see where we are on Friday.
3. Not sure what you mean by this.
4. Agreed. But has also said he is looking for another CB. My concern is that he is looking for back up cover not a starter. Again, we'll see where we are on Friday. Personally I'd go for Dendoncker as he can cover CB and DM and is going to be class. Maybe Gibson.
5. Don't agree at all. Look at the players unavailable for yesterdays game and we still put out a strong looking team with options from the bench. Take some time to have a look at other clubs squads. Chelsea's is tiny and would be in crisis if they had our injury list. Both Liverpool and Arsenal are way overloaded with attack minded players. Spurs have a very small squad too. Get our injured players back and we lack a striker, a left side CB and cover for LB. All identified by the manager and, hopefully, sorted by end of window. Ideally I would also want another DM (sorted if we bring in Dendoncker for CB) and a pacey wide man if Mirallas goes.
6. Agreed. see 1 above.
Anyway, the bottom line is that I agree with most of your points apart from squad depth, which is, I believe, better than you think when compared with our peers (Man Utd apart). But I don't think you answered the original posters comments. He wasn't arguing that we have a team that can compete on the same terms as City, United Chelsea etc. He was arguing that our fans shouldn't expect to be able to compete with those teams at this stage in our evolution, given that we have only just started and they are all well and truly established. And I think he's spot on. For me, it was the manner of our defeat (and our inability to hold out against 10 men last week) that was disappointing rather than the defeat itself.
not claiming to be ITK...![]()
Looks like it went well.