They should all be able to play football to a PL level though. 3rd choice RB at a team that finished 15 points behind us in the league. #ambition
Who would you propose we sign?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They should all be able to play football to a PL level though. 3rd choice RB at a team that finished 15 points behind us in the league. #ambition
Would the fans of any of the teams above us accept, let alone defend, the signing of a "bang average player"? We have an inferiority complex from the fans all the way up to the board room.
You're still not justifying to me the need to buy a crap player mate, sorry. Did you champion the signings of Stek and Alcarez per chance, when a lot of people didn't see the point? This deal stinks of that.Kiev hit us for 5 ffs - Alcaraz was crap but not at fault for it all so what you're saying is a huge stretch. And Stones was an established first team player who should have played that game. Kenny and Connolly aren't.
Kenny may well go out on loan. Connolly too.
The thing is they'll most likely be given a full pre-season to get game time. If they really impress - like Holgate did last year - they'll keep their places.
But that isn't a sure thing. The step up is massive, and Koeman probably wants a more experienced player that he knows to call upon should it be required.
And rather than spend huge wages on an older player like Zabaleta or Sagna, or spend a hefty transfer fee on a hipster, FIFA-spaffing favourite, he'd rather get a cheap, easy deal done early on to have said player bedded in.
Now does that not seem sensible?
Average isn't awful.
And yes, the teams above us would 'accept it'.
Arsenal do it - they spunked £32mil on one last summer, and L'Pool do it as well. So do City, and Utd. Chelsea as well. Spurs spent 30mil on Sissoko.
Martina would be what he is - back-up. He'd be competition for two 20-year-olds who at the moment present our only options at full-back heading into the season.
It's a cheap, easy deal that can be done quickly and the manager knows the player.
I'd like somebody better. But I can see why we'd get this guy in.
I'm sorry zatara but what the hell is this? What the hell are you basing any of this on? how many games has Kenny played for the first team? How many games did he cover for coleman in after he got injured? Yet you are spouting that he will be starting in august? Then you throw in connolly?
In fact between the two of them they have made 3 substitute appearances ever for the club . Why the hell are you going on about them suddenly playing for the first team out of nowhere? If kenny is good enough he will make the step up but i can guarantee you Koeman isn't sitting around even contemplating putting Kenny in the team based on his 2 substitute appearances he has made.
I'm sorry but it is talking out of your arse to make giant posts about players then, in your own words don't claim them to be good enough anyway! It is literally picking young right backs at the club out and claiming you know exactly what koeman will do.
I know what koeman could do, he could sign the lad he got as a back up once before for cheap and use him again. That is a realistic opinion.
Without claiming to know how good Kenny and Connolly are, I can categorically state that both are better than Martina.
Awful at Twente, awful at Southampton...
We have England u20's starting full backs in our squad...they should be adequate cover for Coleman compared to this guy who I think is terrible and a guaranteed liability
They should all be able to play football to a PL level though. 3rd choice RB at a team that finished 15 points behind us in the league. #ambition
They're the only tragic teds who still bite at my tired and tedious bait.Biffs lol Chico were you been hiding you only come on here to slate the FIFA kids now![]()
You're still not justifying to me the need to buy a crap player mate, sorry. Did you champion the signings of Stek and Alcarez per chance, when a lot of people didn't see the point? This deal stinks of that.
That's called hindsight - think everyone expected Xhaka to be a real hit.
I take it you were made up last summer when we signed Stek from the team that finished 5 places above us?
I didn't. He's a good player, but he's nothing special.
That was from seeing a few CL/EL games and watching him in the Euros, btw.
Now, obviously I'm not claiming to have intimate profound knowledge of every European footballer, but sometimes you can just tell.
Erm...and yet I was the 1st one here to say Gueye's stats were great for villa...
Funny how people vault really...takes a 'special' person
You're a bit of a turtlehead
Well I don't suspect many other people would agree with you so think it's wrong to think us signing a Cuco Martina is the same as Arsenal signing a highly coveted Granit Xhaka.
Chatting a slight bit of wham there mate.
Oh yeh, I'm not saying that.
Obviously, they're two totally different category of player.
Which is why Martina is on a free and would add a bit of competition for two very young defenders, while Xhaka (rightly or wrongly) cost £32m.